• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: S.B.M. SAS RIGIDLOOP; RIGIDLOOP BTB ADJUSTABLE CORTICAL SYSTEM - STANDARD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

S.B.M. SAS RIGIDLOOP; RIGIDLOOP BTB ADJUSTABLE CORTICAL SYSTEM - STANDARD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 232485
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/15/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
No incident during manufacturing - no other complaint concerning this batch number.The device is discarded - not available for expertise.Additional information requested by sbm / received on 03 may 2022: is it possible to have the batch number of this device? code 232485 lot 216188.The local description of the event stipulates that there was no damage to the patient being a cadaver ligament: did this event occur during a clinical test on a cadaver? the ligament used for the reconstruction of the cruciate was from the tissue bank and therefore it was a donor ligament to be corpse: from the same anatomical piece it was possible to take a second ligament for the reconstruction on the patient.Did the health care facility declare this incident to the national competent authority? no.Further questions to our distributor to complete our investigation: were there any contributing conditions related to the event? (trauma, illness, previous surgery, patient anatomy.) how did the bone fracture? please report on the circumstance and use when the event occurred.Device implantation area: particular bone quality? diameter of transplant? has a prior tapping of the tunnel been carried out? what is the patient's condition today? did the surgeon indicate that the device malfunctioned or failed to perform as intended? insufficient information / analysis is ongoing.____________________________________________________.
 
Event Description
(b)(4).Incident occured in (b)(6): information transmitted by our distributor: event date was april 15th for one product code 232485 rigidloop bone-tendon-bone (btb) adjustable button with unknown lot number.This device is not available to return to manufacturer.Event description: "the bone is broken during ligament traction".Was surgery delayed due to the reported event? yes, if yes, number of minutes: 90, action taken when event occurred? use of a different device , was procedure successfully completed? yes, were fragments generated? no, if yes, were they removed easily without additional intervention? unknown, patient status/ outcome / consequences: no, was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required: unknown, is the patient part of a clinical study: unknown, device property of: none, device in possession of: none.No signs, symptoms or patient involvement.Surgery prolonged.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No incident during manufacturing - no other complaint concerning this batch number.The device is discaded - not available for expertise.Additional information requested by sbm / received on 03 may 2022: is it possible to have the batch number of this device? code 232485, lot 216188.The local description of the event stipulates that there was no damage to the patient being a cadaver ligament: did this event occur during a clinical test on a cadaver? the ligament used for the reconstruction of the cruciate was from the tissue bank and therefore it was a donor ligament to be corpse: from the same anatomical piece it was possible to take a second ligament for the reconstruction on the patient.Did the health care facility declare this incident to the national competent authority? no.Further questions to our distributor to complete our investigation: were there any contributing conditions related to the event? (trauma, illness, previous surgery, patient anatomy.) how did the bone fracture? please report on the circumstance and use when the event occurred.Device implantation area: particular bone quality? diameter of transplant? has a prior tapping of the tunnel been carried out? what is the patient's condition today? did the surgeon indicate that the device malfunctioned or failed to perform as intended? insufficient information / analysis is ongoing.Follow up1 - (b)(6) 2022.This is a revision surgery following a failure of a first intervention with competitor products.There was a particularity: the ligament used for the reconstruction of the cruciate was from the tissue bank and therefore it was a donor ligament to be corpse.Bone broke in the proximal part where the device is fixed to the femoral fixation device adjustable btb and it broke during the traction phase of the ligament in the femoral tunnel, the implant was not returned - it was discarded.No photos.This analysis is based on manufacturing data and data provided by user and distributor.The components making up the medical device comply with our specifications and the system has been properly assembled - hypothesis: the bone block fractured because the hole through which the braids of the rigidloop must pass was drilled too close to the edges which made the bone block fragile.No corrective action implemented.
 
Event Description
(b)(4).Incident occured in italy: information transmitted by our distributor: event date was april 15th for one product code 232485 rigidloop bone-tendon-bone (btb) adjustable button with unknown lot number.This device is not available to return to manufacturer.Event description: "the bone is broken during ligament traction".Was surgery delayed due to the reported event? yes, if yes, number of minutes: 90, action taken when event occurred? use of a different device , was procedure successfully completed? yes, were fragments generated? no, if yes, were they removed easily without additional intervention? unknown, patient status/ outcome / consequences: no, was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required: unknown, is the patient part of a clinical study: unknown, device property of: none, device in possession of: none.No signs, symptoms or patient involvement.Surgery prolonged.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RIGIDLOOP
Type of Device
RIGIDLOOP BTB ADJUSTABLE CORTICAL SYSTEM - STANDARD
Manufacturer (Section D)
S.B.M. SAS
zi du monge
lourdes, 65100
FR  65100
Manufacturer (Section G)
S.B.M. SAS
zi du monge
lourdes, 65100
FR   65100
Manufacturer Contact
regine bareilles
zi du monge
lourdes, 65100
FR   65100
MDR Report Key14305488
MDR Text Key290937919
Report Number3004549189-2022-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K202193
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number232485
Device Lot Number216188
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/21/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/06/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/21/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/02/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-