|
Based on the investigation analysis, the event was reported on the 2nd day after insertion on (b)(6), 2022.The sensor was settling after insertion and displayed temporary mismatch on (b)(6), 2022.Once the sensor settled, the system displayed better agreement between sensor readings and fingerstick measurements (please refer to the attached screenshots which captures the 2 weeks of glucose plot after insertion showing the mard is around 13.23%).Note: the hypo alert threshold was set at 90 mg/dl, so the hypo alerts were asserted more often, if the sensor readings were below 90 mg/dl.Per the analysis, the fingerstick measurements were not entered during the reported events as captured in the follow-up notes - a.(b)(6) 2022 7:03 pm ct | sg 84 mg/dl - no bg value entered.B.(b)(6) 2022 3:38 pm ct | sg 88 mg/dl - no bg value entered.C.(b)(6) 2022 1:41 pm ct | sg 76 mg/dl - no bg value entered.The overall sensor performance was within expectations and the system is displaying better accuracy (at the time of the analysis), where the mard is at 9.92% for the glucose plot between (b)(6), 2022 (refer to the attached screenshot).User wasn't symptomatic, didn't seek for medical treatment and resolved the event on her own.User was advised to let hcp know of these kind of events.User is currently using the system with up to date glucose information.No further resolution was found necessary for this complaint.H3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.H6.Investigation findings updated to 213.H6.Investigation conclusions updated to 67.
|