|
(b)(4).A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformances noted.Device evaluation: analysis of the returned device identified: opening extended on posterior and underweight.A visual and microscopic analysis was performed which identified: opening crease sharp on posterior, stress marks and creases fold.Based on the device analysis the final assessment is an opening crease sharp on posterior assessed as fold flaw opening.Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: rupture.
|