C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 20 GAUGE POWERGLIDE PRO MIDLINE CATHETER 8CM BASIC KIT; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,SHORT-TERM LESS THAN 30 DAYS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 03/22/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of refx4468 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported "midline broke off inside a patient resulting in the patient needing surgery." add information received 04/21/2022: a detailed description of the event: while removing, the midline broke off and became dislodged.How was the break and/or retained segment discovered? are radiographic images available? x-ray.Were all the missing/broken pieces retrieved and accounted for? yes, during surgery.What type of imaging was used to verify broken piece in patient? are pictures available? x-ray.What type of catheter securement was utilized? unknown, not documented.At what point during device use (i.E.Insertion, infusion, removal) did the break occur? removal.Any long-term patient harm? potential for infection.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported "midline broke off inside a patient resulting in the patient needing surgery." add information received 04/21/2022: a detailed description of the event: while removing, the midline broke off and became dislodged.How was the break and/or retained segment discovered? are radiographic images available? x-ray.Were all the missing/broken pieces retrieved and accounted for? yes, during surgery.What type of imaging was used to verify broken piece in patient? are pictures available? x-ray.What type of catheter securement was utilized? unknown, not documented.At what point during device use (i.E.Insertion, infusion, removal) did the break occur? removal.Any long-term patient harm? potential for infection.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged catheter was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was one 20ga x 8cm powerglide pro midline catheter.The catheter shaft was broken near the molded joint.The proximal fragment, including the luer adapter, was not returned for evaluation.Curved shape memory and use residues were observed throughout the sample.Microscopic inspection of the break site revealed a partially granular and partially glossy fracture surface.The glossy region exhibited a striated texture.The fracture features were sharply defined.The fracture exhibited a tapered profile.The glossy striated region of the fracture surface suggested that damage was initiated through contact with a sharp instrument such as scissors or a scalpel.The location of the damage suggested that catheter securement or removal techniques may have contributed.H3 other text: evaluation findings are in section h11.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|