|
This report is being submitted to report additional information.The following sections are being reported: d4: expiration date and unique identifier (udi) number.H2: if follow-up, what type.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer.H4: device manufacturer date.H6: type of investigation.H6: investigation findings.H6: investigation conclusions.H10: additional narratives/data.The product was returned, the reported event was non-verifiable.Based on the evaluation and dimensional analysis, device malfunction has not occurred.Additionally, there is no existing nonconformance/capa/hhe/d/ie/product holds against the reported device that did or could cause or contribute to the reported event.Monthly post market trending review identified no actionable trends or corrective actions for the reported event or device.Zimmer biomet quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming product.Therefore, based on the available information, the product was within specifications and conforming when it left zimmer biomet.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.It was confirmed that all operations and inspections were executed as per applicable procedure.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Lot was inspected and passed all acceptance criteria by qa.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and no other complaint was identified.The device could not be functionally tested for the reported failure/event.Therefore, the reported event could not be recreated.A definitive root cause could not be determined.No further investigation or immediate capa/hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|