• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL UNKNOWN T2 SUPRACONDYLAR NAIL (SCN); ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL UNKNOWN T2 SUPRACONDYLAR NAIL (SCN); ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_KIE
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 12/12/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The manufacturer became aware of a literature published by the department of orthopedic surgery, anjo kosei hospital, japan.The title of this report is, ¿clinical outcome of surgical treatment for distal femoral fracture with locking plate and intramedullary retrograde nail ¿, published on december 12, 2014, which is associated with the stryker ¿t2 supracondylar nailing system¿.The article can be found at https://doi.Org/10.11359/chubu.2014.1101.This report includes an analysis of the clinical data that was collected on 27 patients, and the cases in this study range from may 2005 to july 2012.During the review of the literature, it was not possible to establish a specific device detail, patient information, and currently no additional device information is available.It was reported that 7 patients experienced knee pain, which required implant removal.The report states, ¿in terms of postoperative complications, there were 8 cases in group n where the implant was removed because of knee pain thought to have been caused by a condylar screw.In 3 of these cases, joint mobilization was performed during implant removal because flexion was restricted in the knee.¿ (1 out of the 8 is reported under (b)(4)).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint has been generated based on findings discovered during post market surveillance literature review.The alleged knee pain, which required implant removal, could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other additional information was received from the author.More detailed information about the patient medical history, the event circumstances, radiographs and the involved device(s) must be available in order to determine the root cause.If any additional information becomes available, the investigation will be reopened and re-evaluated accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction.The manufacturer became aware of the following medical journal published by the department of orthopedic surgery, anjo kosei hospital, japan, attached to this report.The title of this report is, ¿clinical outcome of surgical treatment for distal femoral fracture with locking plate and intramedullary retrograde nail ¿, published on december 12, 2014, which is associated with the stryker ¿t2 supracondylar nailing system¿.
 
Event Description
The manufacturer became aware of a literature published by the department of orthopedic surgery, anjo kosei hospital, japan.The title of this report is, ¿clinical outcome of surgical treatment for distal femoral fracture with locking plate and intramedullary retrograde nail ¿, published on december 12, 2014, which is associated with the stryker ¿t2 supracondylar nailing system¿.The article can be found at https://doi.Org/10.11359/chubu.2014.1101.This report includes an analysis of the clinical data that was collected on 27 patients, and the cases in this study range from may 2005 to july 2012.During the review of the literature, it was not possible to establish a specific device detail, patient information, and currently no additional device information is available.It was reported that 7 patients experienced knee pain, which required implant removal.The report states, ¿in terms of postoperative complications, there were 8 cases in group n where the implant was removed because of knee pain thought to have been caused by a condylar screw.In 3 of these cases, joint mobilization was performed during implant removal because flexion was restricted in the knee.¿ (1 out of the 8 is reported under (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN T2 SUPRACONDYLAR NAIL (SCN)
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
GM  D-24232
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
GM   D-24232
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key14345104
MDR Text Key291277131
Report Number0009610622-2022-00182
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported7
Summary Report (Y/N)Y
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_KIE
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/20/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/10/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/08/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-