|
As reported, the distal end of the an 82cm angled - extra support elitecross support catheter became trapped at the point of total occlusion and was difficult to remove.Additionally, after removal of the elitecross support catheter, there was a crack observed at the distal tip.The procedure was completed with the use of an unknown balloon catheter and the implantation of an unknown stent.There was no reported injury to the patient.This was during a procedure to treat a severely calcified, chronic totally occluded (cto) lesion in the mid superficial femoral artery (sfa) in which a contralateral approach was made with the elitecross support catheter.There was no tortuosity to the target vessel.The elitecross support catheter was stored and prepped per the instructions for use (ifu) without difficulty.The device did not kink during the procedure and remained in one piece during removal.It was reported that a non-cordis guidewire was able to cross the lesion, there was no damage to the guidewire, and it was able to be removed from the patient without any issues.It was mentioned by the physician that the use of excessive force in the vicinity of severe calcification could have been a factor.Information regarding the devices used to complete the procedure is pending, and the elitecross support catheter was discarded and will not be returned for evaluation.
|
|
As reported, the distal end of an 82cm angled extra support elitecross support catheter became trapped at the point of total occlusion and was difficult to remove.Additionally, after removal of the elitecross support catheter, there was a crack observed at the distal tip.The procedure was completed with the use of an unknown balloon catheter and the implantation of an unknown stent.There was no reported injury to the patient.This was during a procedure to treat a severely calcified chronic total occlusion (cto) in the mid superficial femoral artery (sfa), in which a contralateral approach was made with the elitecross support catheter.There was no tortuosity to the target vessel.The elitecross support catheter was stored and prepped per the instructions for use (ifu) without difficulty.The device did not kink during the procedure and remained in one piece during removal.It was reported that a non-cordis guidewire was able to cross the lesion, there was no damage to the guidewire, and it was able to be removed from the patient without any issues.It was mentioned by the physician that the use of excessive force in the vicinity of severe calcification could have been a factor.Information regarding the devices used to complete the procedure was not provided.And the elitecross support catheter was discarded and will not be returned for evaluation.The device was not returned for analysis as it was discarded.A product history record (phr) review of lot h0000305 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported catheter (body/shaft) withdrawal difficulty and brite tip/distal tip cracked in patient could not be confirmed since the device was not returned for analysis.The exact cause of the issue experienced could not be determined.However, based on the information available for review, lesion characteristics (severely calcified cto) and handling factors (reported use of excessive force) likely contributed to the reported cracked condition of the device.Since excessive force was used, it is also possible that the catheter was wedged into the calcified lesion, which could result in difficulty removing the device from the patient.As warned in the information for safety within the ifu, which is not intended as a mitigation, ¿do not advance or torque the catheter in the vascular system or into a stenotic lesion (chronic total occlusion) unless the distal end is supported by an ancillary device.If damage is detected in the catheter at any time, replace with an undamaged catheter.The ifu also cautions, ¿inspect the catheter before use to verify that its size, shape and condition are suitable for the specific procedure.If strong resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of resistance before proceeding.Torquing the catheter excessively may cause damage to the product and/or, specifically, result in possible separation along the catheter shaft.Advancement, manipulation and withdrawal of the catheter should always be performed under fluoroscopic guidance.Neither the phr review nor the information available for review suggest that the reported failures could be related to the manufacturing process of the unit.Therefore; no corrective/preventative actions will be taken at this time.
|
|
Statement for h10 - this report was previously submitted under manufacturing report number: (b)(4); however, due to absence of regulatory reporting policy for the selected manufacturing site, (b)(4) was created to correct the issue and successfully submit the report to the fda. .
|