|
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: defective device.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
The investigation of the returned device was completed by the failure analysis lab on july 28, 2022.Device evaluation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection, microscopic examination, and shell thickness of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the cpx4 plus smooth medium height 800cc tissue expander was found to have a tear at the juncture of the shell and a patch on the anterior view.A microscopic examination was performed, and the cause of the tear could not be identified.Therefore, a thickness measurement was conducted on the shell at the tear, and the thickness was within manufacturing specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.The manufacturing process is 100% inspection for holes and tears, and for the lot reported, no devices were rejected for leaks.With consideration of process controls and data records reviewed, the tear reported could not be confirmed as a manufacturing defect.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|