| Model Number |
250 (+23.50 D) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Visual Disturbances (2140)
|
| Date of Event |
03/18/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Implant date: (b)(6) 2022.Date of event: (b)(6) 2022.Event occurred in (b)(6).Manufacturer's date of awareness: 19 apr 2022.Inflammation; corneal edema, bulbar hyperemia, blurry vision, eye pain, cell adhesion.Patient condition and symptoms: visual distribances.Health impact: medication required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This initial emdr is being submitted to fda for outside us like products reporting."adhesion of cells" is indicated as a potential adverse event related to iol implantation in hoya ifu covered under the warnings section.Manufacturer's codes for: type of investigation, findings, and conclusion are pending device return and completion of product investigation.Once the product investigation is completed, a follow-up report will be submitted to fda which will include the manufacturer's codes for type of investigation, findings, and conclusion.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Implant date: (b)(6) 2022.Date of event: 18 mar 2022.Event occurred in china.Manufacturer's date of awareness: 19 apr 2022.Inflammation; corneal edema, bulbar hyperemia, blurry vision, eye pain, cell adhesion.Patient condition and symptoms: visual disturbances.Health impact: medication required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up #1 emdr is being submitted to fda for a reportable event that occurred outside of the usa.The report includes corrected information and additional information not available/included in the initial report.Corrected information: h3 - corrected to device not returned to manufacturer.Additional information: g6 - type of report - noted as follow-up #1.H2 - type of follow-up - noted for corrected information and additional information.H6 - added codes for manufacturer's investigation: type; findings; and conclusion.The product was not returned to the manufacturer.The investigation was conducted, with the methods and results as noted below.No abnormalities were found in production and inspection records of the product.(serial no: (b)(6); model: 250).There were not any abnormalities on the sterilization records of the lot.(er484) pictures and post operative inflammation summary form (pois) were available for investigation.Based on a review of this information, this case is not bacterial endophthalmitis.The exact root cause of the event was not determined.However, based on available information, we believe this event was not caused by our product quality.A review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates that no significant trends have been identified at this time and no capa is required as part of the product evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|