• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MITG - RF SURGICAL SYSTEMS SITUATE; COUNTER, SPONGE, SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MITG - RF SURGICAL SYSTEMS SITUATE; COUNTER, SPONGE, SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 01-0035
Medical Device Problem Code False Positive Result (1227)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Unintended Radiation Exposure (4565)
Date of Event 04/11/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, after vaginal delivery, the device had a scan error message.All counts were correct/all raytec's visualized.Scanned patient low abd/suprapubic which indicated a retained sponge.Repeated scan with same results.Attempted scan with another machines with same results.Ensured cord was not on or around patient while scanning.Finally documented the confirmation number in patient chart with the last scan.Delivery table moved away from patient.Visual check under and around patient.Checked all open raytecs on delivery table for rfid detection devise.None were missing.The doctor requested to re-examine the patient.They did a vaginal exam and nothing was found.Recounted raytec on delivery table and counts were again correct.Ordered portable pelvic x-ray, which was negative.After x-ray results, finally broke down the table with sponges.Everything was explained to the patient including the md to show the patient the sponges.Both machines were used earlier in the shift and did not detect anything.Machines are currently in the office, so they are not used until examined by biomed or medtronic representative.There was no patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.The evaluation found no potentially contributing factors, and the sample met all related specifications.It was reported that the device gave a false positive detection.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be identified because no related problem was detected with the device.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SITUATE
Common Device Name
COUNTER, SPONGE, SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MITG - RF SURGICAL SYSTEMS
2101 faraday
carlsbad CA 92008
Manufacturer (Section G)
MITG - RF SURGICAL SYSTEMS
2101 faraday
carlsbad CA 92008
Manufacturer Contact
tracy landers
5920 longbow drive
boulder, CO 80301
3035816943
MDR Report Key14429453
Report Number3005883396-2022-00010
Device Sequence Number5629190
Product Code LWH
UDI-Device Identifier10884521700666
UDI-Public10884521700666
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number01-0035
Device Catalogue Number01-0035
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/18/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/01/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/18/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/16/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age21 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight81 KG
-
-