|
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
APB-5-15-3D-SS |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/27/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The axium prime coil was returned for analysis.No bends or kinks were found with the axium prime pusher.The shield coil was found in good condition.The release wire coin was found against the lumen stop.The implant coil was found not attached to the pusher.The implant coil was found to have broken off from the pusher from the coil shell weld.In addition, the implant coil polypropylene filament broke off from the detach element.The implant coil was found stretched.Based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s ¿coil resistance/stuck in catheter¿ report was confirmed; however, the root cause could not be determined.Advancing the axium prime coil against resistance would result in damage to the implant coil subsequently causing the implant coil to stretch and break off from the pusher.Possible contributing factors to ¿coil resistance¿ include using an incompatible device for delivery, tortuous anatomy, failure to maintain a continuous flush or failure to hydrate the axium prime coil before use.The axium prime coil was prepared prior to use.However, information regarding the patient¿s vessel tortuosity and if a continuous saline flush was used was not provided.The catheter used in the event was not returned.Therefore, an analysis could not be performed, and any contributing factors could not be assessed.In addition, the make/model of the catheter was not provided; therefore, compatibility could not be assessed.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medtronic received a report that when delivering the coil to the microcatheter, the coil could not be pushed up in the protective sheath and the resistance to push the coil into the microcatheter was huge.The coil was replaced with the same type of product and the surgery was completed successfully.The devices were prepared as indicated in the ifu.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|