This is filed to report the shunt.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure performed to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with an mr grade of 3-4.The posterior leaflet had a large prolapse.Imaging was challenging due to the anatomy.The clip was advanced however the leaflets could not be grasped, and the posterior leaflet would not remain captured.No clips were implanted.Mr remains 3-4.After the steerable guide catheter was removed, a closure device was used to treat the septum due to bi-directional shunt.No additional information was provided.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Based on available information, a cause for the reported atrial perforation could not be determined.Additionally, atrial perforation is listed in the instructions for use as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported unexpected medical intervention was the result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|