|
|
| Model Number |
DFW225 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Unstable (1667)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Flashers (1864)
|
| Date of Event |
01/12/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain additional information regarding the event; however, to date, the information has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after the intraocular lens (iol) was implanted the patient experienced significant positive dysphotopsia.Lots of distorted vision or bright lights even in daytime causing weird reflections in their vision.The patient's range of vision is 20/30 uncorrected distance visual acuity (ucvda), 20/10 uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (uciva), 2020 uncorrected binocular visual acuity (ucnva) with mrx +0.50 - 0.75 x 037 and 20/20 corrected distance visual acuity (cdva).The patient also feels peripheral vision is somewhat restricted.The doctor is awaiting a time to dilate patient and verify proper toric alignment and is giving the patient time to neuroadapt.The doctor has also given patient a sample of a miotic drop to see if it helps with the dysphotopsia.Additionally, it was learned that the patient is having difficulty driving.The doctor reported that the lens rotated six degrees.The iol remains implanted in the left eye, but indicated that the doctor will probably plan an iol exchange.Through additional follow-up, it was learned that the iol was exchanged in the left eye.Another johnson & johnson iol was implanted as a replacement (dfw150 25.0 diopter).There was no patient injury, but enlargement of temporal wound was required and planned.It was indicated that the patient is still unhappy with the lens and has a lot of dysphotopsia.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|