• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number G33017
Medical Device Problem Codes Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Perforation of Vessels (2135); Anxiety (2328)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It is alleged that "patient received a cook tulip filter.Patient is alleging perforation of ivc.Hospital and medical records have not been provided.".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Customer (person) not provided, information provided by (b)(6).Occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation: filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Rpn/lot is unknown, however, the device is manufactured and inspected according to current controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon further review, it was discovered that this device problem and outcome was originally reported under manufacturer report # 3002808486-2022-00272.As a result, additional information that is received for this particular event for the patient will be reported under manufacturer report # documented in g8 of this medwatch report.Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation: the reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: vena cava perforation.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.20 devices in lot.The product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications, and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
The following information is alleged: the patient received a gunther tulip inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2010.Multiple struts of filter perforated through the patient's ivc.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Additional information: a4,b5, b6, b7, h6 (patient and device codes) investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: tilt, anxiety, worry, fear, limited physical activity.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Unknown if the reported anxiety, worry, fear, limited physical activity is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.A total of 20 devices were manufactured in the reported lot.To date, one additional complaint has been reported against this lot (2414887).The associated work order was reviewed.No related/relevant notes were documented.The device is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications, and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
Patient allegedly received the gunther tulip filter via the right internal jugular vein prior to bariatric surgery.Patient is alleging vena cava perforation which is abutting another organ.Patient notes and further alleges experiencing anxiety, worry, fear, limited physical activity, per a computed tomography (ct) abdomen/pelvis: "findings: this dictation refers only to the ivc filter.Cook gunther tulip filter.Caval perforation: yes.8 o'clock 5.40mm grade 2.5 o'clock 4.10mm grade 3 extending to the l4 prevertebral soft tissues.10 o'clock 4.80mm grade 2.2 o'clock 4.00mm grade 2.Tilt: yes.Left-sided tilt measuring 8.38 degrees.Migration: no.Pertinent negatives: none.Additional findings: none".Per a ct abdomen/pelvis review: "positive for caval perforation.Superior extent of filter is at l2-l3 disc space.Inferior extent mid l4 vertebral body.A total of four prongs have perforated through ivc, series 3, image 43.Maximum distance prong perforated through ivc is 4.25 mm, series 3, image 43.Coronal images show 5.77-degree tilt of filter right-to-left, series 601, image 57.Sagittal images show 7.65-degree tilt posterior-to-anterior, series 602, image 77.Diameter of ivc directly above filter measures 19.17 mm x 20.03 mm, series 3, image 33".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUNTHER TULIP JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Common Device Name
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key14443882
Report Number1820334-2022-00781
Device Sequence Number14582548
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier10827002330174
UDI-Public(01)10827002330174(17)121101(10)2414887
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
K072240
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2010
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG33017
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-JUG
Device Lot Number2414887
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/20/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/24/2022
08/30/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/19/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/22/2022
09/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/25/2009
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening;
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight143 KG
-
-