• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 50MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 50MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS Back to Search Results
Model Number 71335550
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Date of Event 10/21/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: case-(b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after primary left hip surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2011, the patient experienced elevated metal ion levels, pain, mobility problems and an unspecified problem in the acetabular shell.This adverse event was treated with revision surgery on (b)(6) 2021.During the revision surgery, the patient¿s shell, metallic liner, metallic femoral head, and modular head sleeve were explanted and only the stem was left in place.The hip was replaced with a different tha system.The outcome of the patient after the revision was good.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per the surgical technique, the acetabular component is to be impacted with 15-20° of anteversion and 40-45° inclination angle.However, the orthopedic surgery note indicated the acetabular component was vertical.It is unclear if the vertical position of the cup was a result of implantation or migration of the implant.It is unknown if the position of the cup led to accelerated wear and the reported elevated metal ion levels, pain, mobility problems, and inflammation secondary to metal particles.Without the supporting primary and revision operative reports, imaging, and/or the analysis of the explanted components, the root cause of the reported clinical reactions cannot be confirmed.It cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant or implant failure.The patient impact beyond revision and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of instructions for use for total hip systems revealed that metal sensitivity reactions and/or allergic reactions to foreign materials have been reported in patients following joint replacement, which have required device removal, this has been identified in the adverse events in primary and revision surgery section.Also, postoperative, the patient should be advised to report any pain, decrease in range of motion and unusual incidences.Periodic x-rays, prescribed by the physician, are recommended for comparison to immediate postoperative conditions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.An historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but are not limited to wear of the implant, device migration, joint tightness or abnormal motion over time.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 50MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key14455418
Report Number1020279-2022-02458
Device Sequence Number6569509
Product Code MBL
UDI-Device Identifier03596010598233
UDI-Public03596010598233
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
K070756
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2011
Device Explanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/08/2021
Device Model Number71335550
Device Catalogue Number71335550
Device Lot Number11GM05073
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/26/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/08/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/20/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/11/2011
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
71306614/SYN POR FEM COMP SZ 14; 71332520/REF SPHER HEAD SCREW 20MM; 71332530/REF SPHER HEAD SCREW 30MM; 74222100/MODULAR SLEEVE -4MM 12/14
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-