| Model Number |
NR400Z |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
04/25/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to aesculap inc.That a as nut f/femur extens.Stem all sz.Neutr.(part # nr400z) was implanted during a left knee revision surgery performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, post-operative bone deterioration of femur and tibia occurred.The complaint device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.An additional medical intervention was required.According to the patient , a revision surgery in the future is likely.Additional information was not provided.The malfunction is filed under aic reference (b)(4).Associated medwatch reports: (b)(4) - nr191z (2916714-2022-00055).(b)(4) - nr291z (2916714-2022-00056).(b)(4) - nr565z (2916714-2022-00057).(b)(4) - nr565z (2916714-2022-00058).(b)(4) - nr611m (2916714-2022-00059).(b)(4) - nr071z (2916714-2022-00060).(b)(4) - nr005z (2916714-2022-00061).(b)(4) - nr400z (2916714-2022-00062).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: the device was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation of the unit was performed and no parts were returned for failure analysis.Therefore, the investigation was not able to confirm a device issue that could be associated with the reported event.Batch history review: the device history records (dhr) were reviewed for the reported lot number; the device was found to be within specification at the time of production.All device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.No similar complaints were identified against the same lot number with a similar reported event.Conclusion: a definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.There is no indication of a material defect, manufacturing failure, or design error on the basis of the device history record.For further investigation, examination of the complaint device is required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: b5 - patient harm updated, patient condition, planned revision date.B7 - patient medical history.Investigation results previously submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Update: the patient provided some additional information including the proposed revision date of (b)(6) 2023.She had been in contact with a newer surgeon in 2019, after the accident; the doctor at that time noted that the implant was "fine".Some recent unspecified diagnostic test results supposedly showed that the stem was broken or disconnected.She is now working with cedars-sinai orthopedic center.The adverse event is filed under aag reference (b)(4).Associated medwatch reports: 400554585 - nr191z (2916714-2022-00055), 400554587 - nr565z (2916714-2022-00056), 400554588 - nr565z (2916714-2022-00057), 400554589 - nr611m (2916714-2022-00058), 400554590 - nr071z (2916714-2022-00059), 400554591 - nr005z (2916714-2022-00060), 400554592 - nr400z (2916714-2022-00061).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|