• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. PDS II POLYDIOXANONE SUTURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. PDS II POLYDIOXANONE SUTURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Failure to Anastomose (1028); Granuloma (1876); Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 01/22/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Does the surgeon believe that any of the ethicon products (pds suture, monocryl suture, vicryl suture) involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with any of the ethicon products (pds suture, monocryl suture, vicryl suture) used in this procedure? if so, please provide details.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.(b)(4).The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Related events captured via / events were submitted via 2210968-2022-03904, and 2210968-2022-03905.Citation: journal of pediatric surgery, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Jpedsurg.2022.01.043.
 
Event Description
Title: modified laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in children: does subcutaneous suture type matter? the aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of surgical site infection associated with different suture types used during modified laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.From september 2016 through march 2020, 113 patients who underwent modified laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement were included in the study.There were 58 males and 55 females with a median age of 9 months (range 3 months to 3 years).Suture type utilized by surgeons for modified laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement included poliglecaprone (i.E.Monocryl, ethicon) in 46 patients, polyglactin (i.E.Vicryl, ethicon) in 17 patients, and polydioxanone (i.E.Pds, ethicon) in 50 patients.Complications include surgical site infection (n=11), dislodgement (n=15), site leakage (n=11), and granulation tissue formation (n=39).In conclusion, absorbable braided and long-lasting monofilament transabdominal tacking sutures may increase risk of surgical site infection following modified laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.In this cohort, the use of poliglecaprone (monocryl) suture was associated with no ssis and similar rates of postoperative dislodgement, leakage, and granulation tissue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PDS II POLYDIOXANONE SUTURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
MDR Report Key14456674
MDR Text Key292177869
Report Number2210968-2022-03903
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NEW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
N18331
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/20/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-