Model Number IPN038310 |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/25/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The complaint is reported as: "a patient went to the nephrology department on (b)(6) 2022 for taking care of hypertensive acute lung edema with dialysis complicated by ischemic and valvular heart disease.The catheter was inserted on left femoral.On (b)(6) 2022, the catheter was found with a three-quarter came off bandage, the puncture site was at the air and the extension line separated.The catheter was clamped.There was no hemorrhage and no air in the central line.There was no complication related to this incident.The patient was moved to trendelenburg position and left in bed for 1 hour, under increased surveillance.The constants remained normal (ta 12/65, pulse 72, oxygen saturation normal (95 in air)), with no clinical signs suggestive of gas embolism.After consulting the doctor, the catheter was removed.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).Complaint verification testing could not be performed as it was reported that the sample is not available for return.A device history record review was performed and no relevant findings were identified.Without the device to evaluate the complaint could not be confirmed and the probable cause could not be determined from the available information.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for reports of this nature.
|
|
Event Description
|
The complaint is reported as: "a patient went to the nephrology department on (b)(4) 2022 for taking care of hypertensive acute lung edema with dialysis complicated by ischemic and valvular heart disease.The catheter was inserted on left femoral.On (b)(4) 2022, the catheter was found with a three-quarter came off bandage, the puncture site was at the air and the extension line separated.The catheter was clamped.There was no hemorrhage and no air in the central line.There was no complication related to this incident.The patient was moved to trendelenburg position and left in bed for 1 hour, under increased surveillance.The constants remained normal (ta 12/65, pulse 72, oxygen saturation normal (95 in air)), with no clinical signs suggestive of gas embolism.After consulting the doctor, the catheter was removed.".
|
|
Event Description
|
The complaint is reported as: "a patient went to the nephrology department on (b)(6)2022 for taking care of hypertensive acute lung edema with dialysis complicated by ischemic and valvular heart disease.The catheter was inserted on left femoral.On(b)(6)2022, the catheter was found with a three-quarter came off bandage, the puncture site was at the air and the extension line separated.The catheter was clamped.There was no hemorrhage and no air in the central line.There was no complication related to this incident.The patient was moved to trendelenburg position and left in bed for 1 hour, under increased surveillance.The constants remained normal (ta 12/65, pulse 72, oxygen saturation normal (95 in air)), with no clinical signs suggestive of gas embolism.After consulting the doctor, the catheter was removed.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Qn#(b)(4).The customer returned a 3-l cvc catheter and additional extension tubing for evaluation.Signs of use in the form of biological material were found on the catheter body.Visual inspection of the catheter confirmed the distal extension line was separated approximately 9 mm from the luer hub.The separation points were found to be smooth, consistent with a sharp instrument such as a scalpel or scissors contacting the extension line.The total length of the catheter body measured 218 mm, which is within specifications of 207-227 mm per catheter graphic.The distal extension line was separated 9 mm, from the luer hub.The outer diameter of the distal extension line measured 1.728 mm, which is within specifications of 1.68-1.78 mm per distal extension line extrusion graphic.The inner diameter of the distal extension line measured 1.1684 mm which is within specifications of 1.14-1.24 mm per distal extension line extrusion graphic.The catheter was functionally tested per the instructions for use (ifu).The ifu provided with this kit states, "prepare the catheter for insertion by flushing each lumen and clamping or attaching the injection caps to the appropriate extension lines." both the proximal and medial lines flushed as expected.A manual tug test confirmed the proximal and medial luer hubs were secure to their extension lines.A device history record review was performed, and no relevant findings were identified.The ifu provided with this kit warns the user, "do not suture directly to the outside diameter of the catheter to minimize the risk of cutting or damaging the catheter or impeding catheter flow.To minimize the risk of cutting the catheter do not use scissors to remove the dressing." the complaint of an extension line separated/torn during use was confirmed by investigation of the returned sample.The distal extension line had separated near the luer hub.The separation points were smooth , consistent with a sharp object cutting the extension line.A device history record review was performed, and no relevant findings were identified.Based on the customer description and the sample returned , unintentional use error likely caused or contributed to this event.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend on complaints of this nature.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|