• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CROSSER; RECANALIZATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CROSSER; RECANALIZATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number CRUS6106
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/03/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiration date: 07/2023).The information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure, the tip of the catheter allegedly broke off in plaque.Reportedly the tip remains in patient but trapped by stent in iliac.However, no additional intervention or medication required.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.One electronic photo was provided and reviewed.The photo shows the distal part of the crosser catheter.The distal tip was noted to be missing from the catheter.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the detachment issue as the distal tip was noted to be detached in the provided photo.A definitive root cause for the reported tip detachment issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.D4 (expiration date: 07/2023).H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure, the tip of the catheter allegedly broke off in plaque.Reportedly the tip remains in patient but trapped by stent in iliac.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure, the tip of the catheter allegedly broke off in plaque.Reportedly the tip remains in patient but trapped by stent in iliac.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one 6s crosser cto recanalization catheter was returned for evaluation.There is no anomaly noted to transducer handle or saline hub.The distal tip and marker band were noted to be missing from the catheter.No functional testing was performed due to the nature of the complaint.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for detachment of device or device component issue as the distal tip and marker band was noted to be detached and missing from the catheter.One electronic photo was provided and reviewed.The photo shows the distal part of the crosser catheter.The distal tip and marker band was noted to be missing from the catheter.Based on the provided photo, the detachment of device or device component issue can be confirmed.A definitive root cause for the reported tip detachment issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CROSSER
Common Device Name
RECANALIZATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury 12804
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key14460571
Report Number2020394-2022-00392
Device Sequence Number14624221
Product Code PDU
UDI-Device Identifier10801741125642
UDI-Public(01)10801741125642
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K161208
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/21/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberCRUS6106
Device Catalogue NumberCRUS6106
Device Lot NumberGFFT3129
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/30/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/31/2022
06/21/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/20/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/01/2022
06/24/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-