• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRIO ST; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRIO ST; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5950040
Medical Device Problem Code Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Rash (2033)
Date of Event 07/15/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, the patient experienced a rash post-implant of the bard/davol ventrio st mesh.The patient's allergist has been provided with a sample mesh to perform reactivity testing.As reported, the testing has not been scheduled.Based on the information provided to date, no conclusion can be made.Allergic reaction is a known inherent risk of hernia repair surgery and is listed in the adverse reactions section of the instructions for use, supplied with the device as a possible complication.Review of manufacturing records confirms product was manufactured to specification.To date, this is the only reported complaint for this manufacturing lot of 147 units released for distribution in feb, 2021.If/when the testing is performed and the results provided, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.Not returned ¿ remains implanted.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, a bard/davol ventrio st mesh was implanted during july 2021 and the patient has since developed a rash.As reported, the patient is being treated by the patient's allergist; specific treatment is unknown.As reported, the surgeon and allergist would like to perform a reactivity test, however the test has yet to be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, a bard/davol ventrio st mesh was implanted during (b)(6) 2021 and the patient has since developed a rash.As reported, the patient is being treated by the patient's allergist; specific treatment is unknown.As reported, the surgeon and allergist would like to perform a reactivity test, however the test has yet to be performed.Addendum: as reported, the patient underwent reactivity testing in (b)(6) 2022.The results were negative for any reaction to the ventrio st mesh.As reported, the patient has been seen at cleveland clinic for surgical consultation to have the mesh removed per the patient¿s request, as she feels her symptoms are related to the mesh.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, the patient experienced a rash post-implant of the bard/davol ventrio st mesh.The patient's allergist has been provided with a sample mesh to perform reactivity testing.As reported, the testing has not been scheduled.Based on the information provided to date, no conclusion can be made.Allergic reaction is a known inherent risk of hernia repair surgery and is listed in the adverse reactions section of the instructions for use, supplied with the device as a possible complication.Review of manufacturing records confirms product was manufactured to specification.To date, this is the only reported complaint for this manufacturing lot of 147 units released for distribution in feb, 2021.Addendum: this is an addendum to the previously submitted mdr to document reactivity test results.Reactivity testing has been performed and as reported the results were negative for an allergic response to the mesh sample.It is unknown at this time, what is causing the patient's reaction.However, based on testing performed the postoperative condition; rash does not appear to be caused by the bard/davol mesh used to treat the patient.Updated fields: b4, b5 (event description).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, the patient experienced a rash post-implant of the bard/davol ventrio st mesh.The patient's allergist has been provided with a sample mesh to perform reactivity testing.As reported, the testing has not been scheduled.Based on the information provided to date, no conclusion can be made.Allergic reaction is a known inherent risk of hernia repair surgery and is listed in the adverse reactions section of the instructions for use, supplied with the device as a possible complication.Review of manufacturing records confirms product was manufactured to specification.To date, this is the only reported complaint for this manufacturing lot of 147 units released for distribution in (b)(6) 2021.Addendum: this is an addendum to the previously submitted mdr to document reactivity test results.Reactivity testing has been performed and as reported the results were negative for an allergic response to the mesh sample.It is unknown at this time, what is causing the patient's reaction.However, based on testing performed the postoperative condition; rash does not appear to be caused by the bard/davol mesh used to treat the patient.Updated fields: b4, b5 (event description), b6 (relevant tests and lab data), h10 addendum: this is an addendum to the previously submitted semdr to correct the annex f code and age unit.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, a bard/davol ventrio st mesh was implanted during (b)(6) 2021 and the patient has since developed a rash.As reported, the patient is being treated by the patient's allergist; specific treatment is unknown.As reported, the surgeon and allergist would like to perform a reactivity test, however the test has yet to be performed.Addendum: as reported, the patient underwent reactivity testing in (b)(6) 2022.The results were negative for any reaction to the ventrio st mesh.As reported, the patient has been seen at cleveland clinic for surgical consultation to have the mesh removed per the patient¿s request, as she feels her symptoms are related to the mesh.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENTRIO ST
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
8005566756
MDR Report Key14461993
Report Number1213643-2022-00259
Device Sequence Number4482697
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031533
UDI-Public(01)00801741031533
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K101920
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2022
Device Catalogue Number5950040
Device Lot NumberHUEY1409
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/27/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/02/2022
11/10/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/20/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/10/2022
11/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/10/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-