| Model Number |
GLX122525 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Advance (2524); Premature Separation (4045)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/09/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by the field, during a coil embolization for a renal artery aneurysm, a 2.5mm x 2.5cm galaxy g3 coil (glx122525, 30393415) was delivered from a concomitant microcatheter (veloute, asahi intecc).However; the device became stuck in the microcatheter when it was being delivered.When the physician pushed and pulled the complaint product in the microcatheter, the coil was detached in the microcatheter.The complaint product and the microcatheter were removed together from the patient's body.After that, the procedure was completed without any problem with using competitive coils.There was no patient injury reported.A continuous flush was done.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Procode: krd/hcg initial reporter: the customer contact information, including name, occupation, phone, fax, and e-mail address, was not reported.The device was discarded.Therefore; no further investigation can be performed.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed for the finished device 30393415 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Updated sections on this medwatch: b4, b5, g3, g6, h2 and h10.Section b5: additional information was received indicating that the devices could be moved when resistance was encountered.There was no evidence of physical material within the device.The device nor the microcatheter kinked or bend prior to the resistance or was noted after removal from the patient.Section e1.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).Complaint conclusion: as reported by the field, during a coil embolization for a renal artery aneurysm, a 2.5mm x 2.5cm galaxy g3 coil (glx122525, 30393415) was delivered from a concomitant microcatheter (veloute, asahi intecc).However, the device became ¿stuck¿ in the microcatheter when it was being delivered.When the physician pushed and pulled the complaint product in the microcatheter, the coil was detached in the microcatheter.The complaint product and the microcatheter were removed together from the patient's body.After that, the procedure was completed without any problem with using competitive coils.There was no patient injury reported.A continuous flush was done.Additional information was received indicating that the devices could be moved when resistance was encountered.There was no evidence of physical material within the device.The device nor the microcatheter kinked or bend prior to the resistance or was noted after removal from the patient.The device was discarded; therefore, no further investigation can be performed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 30393415 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.Impeded in microcatheter and premature coil detachment in microcatheter during removal are known complications associated with the use of the galaxy g3 coil in coil embolization procedures.Per the galaxy g3 instructions for use (ifu): if unusual friction is still noticed during advancement or retraction of the microcoil system, verify flush lines are open and properly pressurized.Then slowly withdraw the entire microcoil system and examine for damage.Replace it with a new microcoil system.If friction still exists, withdraw and examine the delivery catheter system.If the microcoil system becomes immobile in the infusion microcatheter, apply a gentle push-pull motion to free it.If unsuccessful, remove both microcatheter and microcoil system together as a unit and replace with new devices.With the information provided and without the return of the associated devices, it is not possible to determine the root cause of the event.However, the event may have been related to a combination of multiple factors experienced in the clinical setting rather than the design or manufacture of the device.Excessive force applied to a coil through repeated coil deployments or manipulation can increase the possibility of unintended detachment.As part of the cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the events were related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|