| Model Number |
PXW35 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Mechanics Altered (2984); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Failure to Eject (4010); Firing Problem (4011)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888)
|
| Date of Event |
04/01/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during the cath lab procedure, stapler does not grab the skin very well, so the skin is not approximated.One third of the time the staple jams.The surgeon stated when they do get it to work and grab the skin, then half of time, it doesn't release easily.They would open multiple devices until they got enough staples to close the skin.There was extra blood loss.The procedure was completed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Batch # unknown.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information: how much blood was lost (ml)? unknown.Did the patient require a transfusion? no.The patient was taken back to the or; after that the patient was stabilized.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Was the bleeding associated to the skin staplers? was there any medical or surgical intervention done to the patient related to the use of the skin staplers? was the stapling done by one or two individuals? were the skin edges approximated with forceps ahead of the stapler? were the devices fired plastic to plastic? how was the procedure completed? current patient status?.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 06/07/2022.Additional information was requested, and the following was received: was the bleeding associated to the skin staplers? yes.The bleeding was where the staples were and surgeon expected the skin stapling to hold without bleeding.Was there any medical or surgical intervention done to the patient related to the use of the skin staplers? yes, one of the patients had to be brought back to the or and additional suture provided at the bleeding site.I was never given any patient info.Were the skin edges approximated with forceps ahead of the stapler? that information was not given to me.The surgeon stated that they used the same technique that they always have when stapling for years.Were the devices fired plastic to plastic? that information was not given to me.How was the procedure completed? a return to the or for suture was required.Current patient status? patient is reported to be fine at this point.An analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.An evaluation of the manufacturing record could not be performed as the required product identification number was not provided to complete the evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of the post-market surveillance.However, if the product or product id numbers are received at a later date, the investigation will be updated as applicable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 06/27/2022.Additional information was requested, and the following was received: what was the procedure? either a cath lab procedure or orthopedic procedure.What anatomical structure were they closing? various ¿ i never received which part of the skin.Who was using the stapler? surgeons, physician assistants, first assists where was the incision made that was being closed?.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/27/2022.Original report sent with incorrect awareness date.Reported submitted with awareness date of 4/22/2022, the correct date was 5/10/2022.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|