|
It was reported a nester platinum embolization microcoil was difficult to deploy during a left renal artery embolization procedure.The physician accessed the left common femoral artery and placed a 6 fr short sheath for access.An 0.035 wire guide was then advanced into the aorta and an aortogram identified and aided in selection of the left renal artery.A 6fr support sheath was placed for support.An angiographic catheter and wire guide were advanced through the support sheath and advanced into the left renal artery.The wire guide was exchanged.Over the wire and through the angiographic catheter, a 2.4 fr microcatheter was placed in the renal artery.The wire was removed and coiling of the left renal artery commenced with competitor coils.After several coils were placed, advancement of an upsized 6mm x 14cm nester microcoil was attempted, however the physician did not like the placement and therefore removed the coil using the microcatheter.The microcatheter was then reintroduced and placement of a downsized 4mm x 14cm nester coil was attempted using a wire guide.When the coil was positioned at the very distal end of the microcatheter, about 3-5 cm of coil remained in the catheter and could not be pushed further.Flushing with a 3 cc catheter was attempted but was unsuccessful.At this time, the physician attempted to try to extract the 4mm coil using an endovascular snare.The physician was able to grab the coil, but as it was being removed, it "seemed to unravel on itself." the coil got stuck in the angiographic catheter and a small piece of the coil was pulled through the aorta and into the right common iliac artery.The coil remains there.The patient is currently on an aspirin regiment and is scheduled for a ct exam.Additional details regarding patient outcome have been requested but are currently unknown.
|
|
Investigation: evaluation.It was reported by a physician of (b)(6)hospital (houston, usa) that on 01may2022 a nester platinum embolization microcoil (rpn: mwce-18-14-4-nester-01; lot#: 13916357) was difficult to advance and subsequently unraveled.The device was required for left renal artery embolization in 40-year-old female patient.Access was gained via the left common femoral artery (cfa) then the physician advanced a 6fr sheath (flexor ansel; rpn and lot# unknown) and 0.035¿ wire guide (glide wire; manufacturer and model unknown) into the aorta and performed an aortogram.After identifying and access the left renal artery, the user placed multiple competitor coils into the vessel.Then the user attempted to place a 6 mm x 14cm cook nester microcoil, but placement was not satisfactory, so the coil was removed utilizing a 2.4 fr microcatheter from another manufacturer.The microcatheter was reinserted and a competitor¿s wire guide was used to attempt deployment of the complaint microcoil into the renal artery.However, about 3-5cm of the coil could not be advanced out of the distal tip of the catheter.The user then attempted flushing with a 3cc catheter, but this was unsuccessful, so a competitor's snare was obtained to retrieve the coil.The coil was grasped with the snare, but as the device was being removed, the coil unraveled and became stuck in the angiographic catheter.The user then ¿managed to pull down a thin piece of the coil through the aorta and into the right common iliac artery¿; the majority of the 4mm coil remains in the kidney and the rest tracks down the aorta and into the right common iliac artery.The patient is currently on an aspirin regimen and is scheduled for a ct exam.Surgery to perform a nephrectomy and extraction of the remaining coil parts is anticipated.No other adverse events were reported due to this occurrence.Reviews of the documentation, including the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu) and manufacturing instructions of the device, were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, no physical examinations could be conducted.However, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are currently in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) for lot 13916357 found no relevant nonconformances that could have contributed to the reported failure.A database search for found one other complaint associated with this lot number related to this occurrence (mfg.Report reference #: 1820334-2022-01139).Cook also reviewed product labeling.The current instructions for use [t_nec2_rev0] state the following: "instructions for use: 2.Push the loading cartridge completely into the delivery catheter.3.Advance the luer lock connector fitting toward the catheter hub and lock into place.4.Use the pusher stylet to load the nester embolization microcoil into the delivery catheter.Note: the stylet must be pushed as far as possible into the loading cartridge to ensure proper loading.Remove the pusher stylet and loading cartridge.5.To obtain secure placement of the nester embolization microcoil, we recommend the use of the pusher stylet to push the microcoil further into the delivery catheter." evidence gathered upon review of the dmr, product labeling and dhr, does not indicate the device was manufactured out of specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming material in house or in the field.Based on the information provided, no returned product and the results of our investigation, it was concluded that a component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to the event.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|