|
Model Number 100153HS-V-A2 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Stretched (1601); Separation Failure (2547)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/11/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
As reported, the physician situated the lvis jr 3.5x18 and inserted the coil to treat aca(rt) aneurysm.Every coil was used after conducted v-grip based on ifu.He had inserted hypersoft 3d 4x8, hypersoft 3d 3x8, hypersoft 3d 1.5x4 and hypersoft helical 1.5x3.The last coil failed to be detached.He changed the v-grip and tried to detach the coil several times, but still, he could not detach the coil.While he was retrieving the coil, the implant got stretched, so he pushed and crumpled the implant by using a micro snare.After that, he situated lvis 4.5x23 on the crumpled implant and put it on the vessel wall.There was no reported impact or harm to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A search for non-conformance's associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was stated to be available for evaluation but has not yet been returned.If the device is received, the investigation will be performed, and a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation of the returned coil system found the pusher's body coil damaged and stretched at distal, the pusher's hypotube bent at proximal, and the green and yellow lead wires broken at the distal solder joint.The implant was not returned for evaluation.No indication of using a detachment controller was found on the pusher's heater coil.The broken lead wires at the distal solder joint would have caused or contributed to the detachment issue observed during the procedure; furthermore, the radiographic images provided by the customer revealed that the implant was stretched and placed inside the patient, which is also consistent with the reported event.The investigation found the pusher's monofilament with a tensile break shape at the tip which is consistent with the device experiencing excessive force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to stretch and separate from the pusher.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the pusher and lead wire damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|