• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. WENDEL AG ULTRAFLUX AV 1000 S; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. WENDEL AG ULTRAFLUX AV 1000 S; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 01-8981-0
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 04/05/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity. .
 
Event Description
It was reported to fresenius that this critically ill patient experienced abnormal laboratory values following a suspected clogging within the multifiltratepro system during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (cvvhd) on the multifiltratepro with the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter.An allegation was made involving the performance of the ultraflux av 1000s upon initial reporting.Fresenius received a report stating this patient suffering from child class b liver cirrhosis was hospitalized following elevated ammonia levels due to idiopathic postprandial syndrome (exact date of admission unknown).The patient was placed on cvvhd in the intensive care unit presumably to support renal function while critically ill.Through the course of cvvhd therapy, the patient required a ¿kit¿ exchange, indicating disposables were exchanged including the hemofilter.The reason for the initial consumable exchange was not reported; however, there was no indication the exchange was due to any deleterious effect to the patient.Laboratory findings taken approximately 18 hours following the consumable exchange indicated that the patient¿s calcium and calcium substitution began to show ¿atypical courses¿, as well as hypoalbuminemia with albumen levels of approximately 20 g/l (exact laboratory values not provided).Due to abnormal laboratory values, the time to determine patient¿s diagnoses was delayed.The cause of the abnormal laboratory values was attributed to a suspected clogging event within the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter, yet this could not be confirmed.Cvvhd therapy was discontinued as the patient experienced auto diuresis (exact date not reported).No further information including patient demographics, specific laboratory values and causality of this event were not reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h10 (expanding upon initial plant investigation) plant investigation: the reported complaint could not be confirmed.The complaint sample was not available to be returned for evaluation.Due to 100% testing, it is highly unlikely to detect a failure in the retention sample.Furthermore, only a small number of reserve samples is available.Therefore the retention sample analysis is not done.The cause for the failure reported cannot be confirmed based on the current available information.In the past for similar cases, extraction of retain samples showed no unusual residuals which could lead to the reported reaction.Therefore, it is assumed that the patient allergy/reaction might be caused by other factors besides dialyzer, for example, the specific physical/medical status of patient.A review of the instruction for use (ifu) and/or label indicated that the described situation is adequately addressed.A batch record review confirmed that the products have been inspected according to the inspection protocol and were found to be conforming to specifications.No indication for any relationship with the reported failure mode has been found during the review.Based on the information available, the cause of the reported failure could not be traced to the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported to fresenius that this critically ill patient experienced abnormal laboratory values following a suspected clogging within the multifiltratepro system during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (cvvhd) on the multifiltratepro with the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter.An allegation was made involving the performance of the ultraflux av 1000s upon initial reporting.Fresenius received a report stating this patient suffering from child class b liver cirrhosis was hospitalized following elevated ammonia levels due to idiopathic postprandial syndrome (exact date of admission unknown).The patient was placed on cvvhd in the intensive care unit presumably to support renal function while critically ill.Through the course of cvvhd therapy, the patient required a ¿kit¿ exchange, indicating disposables were exchanged including the hemofilter.The reason for the initial consumable exchange was not reported; however, there was no indication the exchange was due to any deleterious effect to the patient.Laboratory findings taken approximately 18 hours following the consumable exchange indicated that the patient¿s calcium and calcium substitution began to show ¿atypical courses¿, as well as hypoalbuminemia with albumen levels of approximately 20 g/l (exact laboratory values not provided).Due to abnormal laboratory values, the time to determine patient¿s diagnoses was delayed.The cause of the abnormal laboratory values was attributed to a suspected clogging event within the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter, yet this could not be confirmed.Cvvhd therapy was discontinued as the patient experienced auto diuresis (exact date not reported).No further information including patient demographics, specific laboratory values and causality of this event were not reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported to fresenius that this critically ill patient experienced abnormal laboratory values following a suspected clogging within the multifiltratepro system during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (cvvhd) on the multifiltratepro with the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter.An allegation was made involving the performance of the ultraflux av 1000s upon initial reporting.Fresenius received a report stating this patient suffering from child class b liver cirrhosis was hospitalized following elevated ammonia levels due to idiopathic postprandial syndrome (exact date of admission unknown).The patient was placed on cvvhd in the intensive care unit presumably to support renal function while critically ill.Through the course of cvvhd therapy, the patient required a ¿kit¿ exchange, indicating disposables were exchanged including the hemofilter.The reason for the initial consumable exchange was not reported; however, there was no indication the exchange was due to any deleterious effect to the patient.Laboratory findings taken approximately 18 hours following the consumable exchange indicated that the patient¿s calcium and calcium substitution began to show ¿atypical courses¿, as well as hypoalbuminemia with albumen levels of approximately 20 g/l (exact laboratory values not provided).Due to abnormal laboratory values, the time to determine patient¿s diagnoses was delayed.The cause of the abnormal laboratory values was attributed to a suspected clogging event within the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter, yet this could not be confirmed.Cvvhd therapy was discontinued as the patient experienced auto diuresis (exact date not reported).No further information including patient demographics, specific laboratory values and causality of this event were not reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h10 (clinical review) clinical review: in the information provided, though laboratory values presented in atypical ranges, there was no indication this patient experienced an adverse event or serious injury related to the abnormal laboratory values.Additionally, medical intervention for this event potentially included changing the hemofilter, disposables, and eventually discontinuing cvvhd therapy, yet there was no indication the medical intervention provided was to reverse any harmful effects of the suspected clogging.Based on the available information, there is no indication of a serious injury, patient death, or other adverse event related to a fresenius product or other issue plant investigation:.The cause for the failure reported cannot be confirmed based on the current available information.In the past for similar cases, extraction of retain samples showed no unusual residuals which could lead to the reported reaction.Lots are subject to 100% testing prior to release.It is highly unlikely that a failure would be detected during evaluation of another retention sample.This described situation is included within the instruction for use (ifu) and product labeling.A batch record review was also performed.No indication for any relationship with the reported failure mode has been found during the review.Therefore, it is assumed that the patient allergy/reaction might be caused by other factors besides dialyzer, for example, the specific physical/medical status of patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLUX AV 1000 S
Type of Device
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. WENDEL AG
fresenius deutschland gmbh
frankfurter str. 6-8
st. wendel 66606
GM  66606
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. WENDEL AG
fresenius deutschland gmbh
frankfurter str. 6-8
st. wendel 66606
GM   66606
Manufacturer Contact
jason busch
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
9043166958
MDR Report Key14487858
MDR Text Key292501685
Report Number3002807005-2022-00014
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
EUA200149
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Administrator/Supervisor
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/24/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number01-8981-0
Device Lot NumberC2BE3100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Device AgeMO
Date Manufacturer Received01/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FRESENIUS MULTIFILTRATE SYSTEM; FRESENIUS MULTIFILTRATE SYSTEM; FRESENIUS MULTIFILTRATE SYSTEM
-
-