Other text: h6: event problem and evaluation codes: updated.H10: device evaluation: the device was returned for investigation.A visual inspection and functional test were performed.Three (3) pictures were attached, during the analysis conducted it could be observed a top view of the bag and then a focus on a section where a damaged can be confirmed.Visual inspection: sample was received torn.When observing the breathing bag, it was confirmed that there was tear near on the crease of the bag.As part of the investigation, 20 samples were taken to see there is any condition could cause torn breathing bags.Sharp edges on binder?s workstation: the test consisted to evaluate if the condition of the binders of the process can be damage / broke the breathing bags.Packaging tested: the test evaluated if the unit can be damage due stuck.Conclusion: it is concluded that failure reported could not be reproduced in the manufacturing process according to the analysis mentioned above.Root cause cannot be associated with the manufacturing process since the failure reported could not be reproduced using the tools from assembly and packaging process.Therefore the damage (broken) was after the product left the manufacturing facilities.The cause of the reported problem could not be determined.No lot number was provided; therefore, dhr (device history review) could not be performed.
|