• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number UES-40
Medical Device Problem Code Noise, Audible (3273)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/27/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation.The evaluation was unable to duplicate the reported abnormal noise from the device.There were corrosion traces of liquid in the device.The output value of monopole electrocoagulation was low due to defective circuit board, which resulted in display of er02 (short circuit error).The investigation is ongoing; therefore, the root cause of the reported event cannot be determined at this time.However, if additional information becomes available this report will be supplemented accordingly.
 
Event or Problem Description
The customer reported that there was alarm when the device worked, and there was louder noise of the fan.The procedure was completed with no reported delay.The fault occurred after use.The customer further reported that the device did not work with alarm when the device was activated.The user did not remember the specific error code, it was said that the error code appeared in the screen when the device worked.It was initially thought that the circuit board was defective.No patient injury reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer¿s final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over 14 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, the root cause could not be identified because the subject device was not returned to the shirakawa factory, and the phenomenon was not reproduced.However, given that corrosion mark inside the device was confirmed, one of the circuit boards may have malfunctioned causing fan control to not function normally.Also, foreign matter may have entered the fan temporarily.The instructions for use (ifu) states the following: important information ¿ please read before use warning to prevent operator shock and instrument damage, keep liquids away from all electrical equipment.If liquid gets on or into the ues-40, terminate operation immediately and contact olympus.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance of this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Common Device Name
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key14503346
Report Number8010047-2022-08910
Device Sequence Number5123755
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier04953170287275
UDI-Public04953170287275
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K030194
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/25/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberUES-40
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/05/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/27/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/28/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/26/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/25/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/10/2008
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-