• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 3DMAX LIGHT; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 3DMAX LIGHT; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0117320
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 07/26/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light (x2) on (b)(6) 2016 (x2).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol 3dmax light (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol 3dmax light (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light (x2) on (b)(6) 2016 (x2).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal and umbilical hernias thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of 3dmax light (device #1 & #2) and ventralex st (device #3).Per op notes, ¿the right and left direct inguinal hernias were repaired with 3dmax mesh (device #1 & #2) and tacked in place.The facial defect below the umbilicus was repaired with ventralex st mesh (device #3) and secured in place with sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia and underwent open repair with implant of bard soft mesh (device #4).Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was excised.Utilizing a bard soft mesh (device #4) a lichtenstein repair was performed and secured the mesh using sutures.The right site was repaired in similar fashion.¿.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2016) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3 (manufacture), d4, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol 3dmax light (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol 3dmax light (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Not returned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3DMAX LIGHT
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key14507713
Report Number1213643-2022-94076
Device Sequence Number19472450
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031052
UDI-Public(01)00801741031052(17)210128(10)HUAP1438
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K091659
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/12/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/28/2021
Device Catalogue Number0117320
Device Lot NumberHUAP1438
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/18/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/05/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/26/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/12/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/15/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Disability;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-