• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDICON EG SCREWDRIVER BLADE; SCREW INSERTION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDICON EG SCREWDRIVER BLADE; SCREW INSERTION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number 75.23.39
Medical Device Problem Code Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Date of Event 03/01/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The returned device had not been disassembled nor cleaned after the procedure.Its four grasping blades were still holding the head portion of the tad (temporary anchorage device or orthodontic screw) positioned at a slant between them.The blades showed strong torsional damage.Upon removal of the tad from the insertion device, multiple dents were observed on the inside surface of its blades.Multiple signs of wear and reuse were found on the device overall.A separate adverse event report is being submitted for the tad.The damage shown by the insertion device has been evaluated.The grasping blades show strong torsional damage and multiple dents on their inside surfaces, which indicates that excessive force was applied during the subject event.At this point it is not possible to establish without a doubt whether the insertion device was already damaged before the event and used anyway; whether the damage was produced wholly during the event; or whether the device was slightly damaged prior to the event and additionally damaged due to excessive torque being applied during the event.Pre-existing damage of the insertion device would have contributed to incorrect alignment of the screw head between the blades, in addition to negatively affecting the angle of force.If the blades of the insertion device were deformed prior to the event it would also indicate that the device instructions for use were not followed by the user.The instructions for use clearly indicate that "in order to prevent failure or mechanical damage of the application instruments during surgery, they must always be checked before each use for mechanical integrity, full functional range, and possible deformation.Damaged instruments must be discarded." tests are currently being performed by an accredited laboratory to aid in resolving the issue and shed further light on the cause of the event.Review of the device history record has revealed neither nonconformances nor deviations during the manufacturing process.The device conformed fully to specifications upon release.As indicated above, tests are being performed by an accredited laboratory and the investigation of this event is ongoing.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
During a procedure involving placement of a temporary anchorage device (tad)/screw implant between the lower right cuspid and 1 bicuspid, the screw was grasped with the grasping blades of the screw insertion device that is the subject of this medical device report.The grasping blades were tightened to firmly hold the tad and the tad was placed.When attempting to release the tad from the insertion device, the head of the tad broke off the flute portion.The tad head remained in the grasp of the insertion device.To recover the broken flute of the tad, a flap was raised from the ridge of the missing 2" bicuspid to the distal of the cuspid and a vertical releasing incision was made over the broken tad.The flute part of the tad was located.Bone was removed circumferentially around the tad to allow the placement of a hemostat around the exposed portion of the tad.The broken tad was backed out using the hemostat.Then the flap was closed by suturing the vertical and gingival incisions together.The patient was given post op instructions, instructions for pain and a follow-up appointment.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The affected device was subject to evaluation by an accredited independent lab facility.The screw grasping component was found to be severely deformed, indicating overload during insertion of the screw, possibly due to user error; specifically, to faulty positioning of the screw in the insertion device.No response was received to multiple requests for additional information with regard to patient outcome and the event.The manufacturer concludes that the failure was due to user error.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SCREWDRIVER BLADE
Common Device Name
SCREW INSERTION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDICON EG
gaensaecker 15
tuttlingen, 78532
GM  78532
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICON EG
gaensaecker 15
tuttlingen, 78532
GM   78532
Manufacturer Contact
thorsten kurz
gaensaecker 15
tuttlingen, 78532
GM   78532
MDR Report Key14516973
Report Number8010099-2022-00002
Device Sequence Number15111958
Product Code DZE
UDI-Device Identifier04046826385583
UDI-Public4046826385583
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K041527
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number75.23.39
Device Lot Number11AC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/27/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/05/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/26/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/03/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/31/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
MOTRIN; PERIOGUARD; TYLENOL
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age14 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-