• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MENTOR TEXAS ARTOURA BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MENTOR TEXAS ARTOURA BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SDC130UH
Medical Device Problem Code Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
Date of Event 05/06/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: tissue expander deflation.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a female patient underwent an unspecified surgery with a mentor artoura plus, smooth, ultra high profile 650cc tissue expander that deflated post implantation.It was reported that the right breast tissue expander would not fill correctly.As a result, the patient underwent explantation on (b)(6) 2022.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The mentor failure analysis lab received a device for this complaint on 27-may-2022.It is an artoura breast tissue expander 650cc device, catalog # smxp130ruh, lot #9559178, udi #(b)(4), 510(k) #k161176.On 07-jun-2022, mentor became aware that this returned device belongs to this complaint.Additionally, a manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
On 05-sep-2022, mentor completed the investigation on the suspect medical device.Device evaluation summary: according to the information received, the tissue expander did not appear to be filling correctly in clinic.The product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection, leak testing, and microscopic examination of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the had an area of delamination at the union between the front patch and shell on the anterior view, without leakage.Leak testing was performed, according to with the mentor procedure, and it revealed a tear on the anterior view, measuring approximately 0.1 cm.In addition, no additional leaks were detected.Microscopic examination was performed on the edges of the rupture, and parallel striations were found in the whole area of the tear.Parallel striations are consistent with markings made by a sharp object perforating the tissue expander shell.Microscopic examination of the returned product indicates that the tissue expander could have been damaged during or subsequent to implantation.The product insert data sheet cautions to not allow cautery devices or sharp instruments, such as scalpels, suture needles, hypodermic needles, hemostats, adson forceps, or scissors to contact the device during the implantation or other surgical procedures.Based on the information currently available, a product issue was identified during the investigation of the sample received.This product issue will be addressed through mentor¿s quality system.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional investigation was performed and it was concluded that the process controls and data records collected for the "tissue expander did not appear to be filling correctly" reported on product complaint was not able to be confirmed as manufacturing defect.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARTOURA BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER
Common Device Name
EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MENTOR TEXAS
3041 skyway circle north
irving TX 75038
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENTOR TEXAS
3041 skyway circle north
irving TX 75038
Manufacturer Contact
michelleann garcia
3041 skyway circle north
irving, TX 75038
646591-7981
MDR Report Key14518027
Report Number1645337-2022-06170
Device Sequence Number12163647
Product Code LCJ
UDI-Device Identifier00081317024392
UDI-Public00081317024392
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K161176
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/04/2025
Device Model NumberSDC130UH
Device Catalogue NumberSMXP130RUH
Device Lot Number9559178
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/09/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/07/2022
09/05/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/26/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/10/2022
09/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/08/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-