|
Catalog Number 65872354 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Urticaria (2278)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
After treatment with gluma desensitizer, the patient went to a dermatologist due to the fact that developed hives of the trunk and limbs in timely correlation to the treatment.The dermatologist currently considers, it is less relevant to gluma desensitizer.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This incident is reportable according to 21 cfr 803.The fda defines this as a serious injury (21 cfr sec.803.3) as the dermatologist reported the patient having an allergic type reaction.The incident will be reported to maintain compliance with 21 cfr 803 and out of an abundance of caution.Patient suffered hive like rash on the trunk and limbs of the body after gluma desensitizer was applied.It is stated in the instructions for use that gluma desensitizer can cause irritation, chemical burns and hypersensitivity.Must not be used if the patient has hypersensitivity like rashes and skin inflammation to any of the ingredients contained in gluma desensitizer.An allergy test has not been completed at this time and it is unknown if an allergy test will be conducted.We cannot determine if our product did or did not cause this allergic type reaction, therefore we will report this incident out of an abundance of caution.Gluma desensitizer is not yet the proven root cause for the triggered allergic reaction.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
On 6/13/2022, follow up information: according to confirmation by the dermatologist, the patient stated that the symptoms appeared 2 -3 months after treatment with gluma desensitizer.The dermatologist concluded that this incident had nothing to do with gluma desensitizer.Therefore, there is no need to report to the authorities.
|
|
Event Description
|
After treatment with gluma desensitizer, the patient went to a dermatologist due to the fact that developed hives of the trunk and limbs in timely correlation to the treatment.The dermatologist currently considers, it is less relevant to gluma desensitizer.On 6/13/2022, follow up information: according to confirmation by the dermatologist, the patient stated that the symptoms appeared 2 -3 months after treatment with gluma desensitizer.The dermatologist concluded that this incident had nothing to do with gluma desensitizer.Therefore, there is no need to report to the authorities.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|