• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON PS X3 TIBIAL INSERT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON PS X3 TIBIAL INSERT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO Back to Search Results
Model Number 5532-G-511
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Bacterial Infection (1735); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Synovitis (2094)
Date of Event 11/01/2017
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
Patient reported a "clean out" of his right knee due to infection.It is unknown if any components were exchanged.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The following devices were also listed in this report: triathlon prim cem fxd bplt #5; cat# 5520b500; lot# atr6k triathlon asymmetric x3 patella; cat# 5551-g-381 ; lot# t8vp triathlon ps fem component, cemented; cat# 5515-f-502; lot# tsswtuu3 it cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.Reported event: an event regarding infection involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was confirmed via medical review.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remained implanted.-clinician review: a review of medical records by clinical consultant indicated: this inquiry reports a total knee replacement that subsequently became infected and was re-operated approximately 1 1/2 years after implantation.While no other information is provided in this particular inquiry, there are associated inquiries which document further surgeries including two-stage revision, arthrodesis, and subsequent amputation.I can confirm that these events occurred since i was able to review records documenting procedures.Regarding the root cause of infection following total knee arthroplasty 1 1/2 years after implantation, i cannot determine it with certainty.The causes are multifactorial including surgical actors and patient factors.Most commonly late infection occurs because of seeding of the arthroplasty from a remote site.As outlined above, this inquiry concerns a total knee replacement which became infected requiring subsequent surgeries which eventually led to an amputation of the right lower extremity.The causes of persistent infection following multiple surgeries after a total knee arthroplasty are multifactorial including surgical factors and patient factors and commonly due to seeding from a remote site.-product history review: could not be performed as lot code information was not provided.-complaint history review: could not be performed as lot code information was not provided.Conclusion: a review of medical records by clinical consultant indicated: this inquiry reports a total knee replacement that subsequently became infected and was re-operated approximately 1 1/2 years after implantation.While no other information is provided in this particular inquiry, there are associated inquiries which document further surgeries including two-stage revision, arthrodesis, and subsequent amputation.I can confirm that these events occurred since i was able to review records documenting procedures.Regarding the root cause of infection following total knee arthroplasty 1 1/2 years after implantation, i cannot determine it with certainty.The causes are multifactorial including surgical actors and patient factors.Most commonly late infection occurs because of seeding of the arthroplasty from a remote site.As outlined above, this inquiry concerns a total knee replacement which became infected requiring subsequent surgeries which eventually led to an amputation of the right lower extremity.The causes of persistent infection following multiple surgeries after a total knee arthroplasty are multifactorial including surgical factors and patient factors and commonly due to seeding from a remote site.All stryker products sold as sterile are validated to a minimum sterility assurance level (sal) of 10^-6 in accordance to applicable iso standards.No further information is possible at this time.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.Product surveillance will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Event or Problem Description
Patient reported a "clean out" of his right knee due to infection.It is unknown if any components were exchanged.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding infection involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was confirmed via medical review.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remained implanted.-clinician review: a review of medical records by clinical consultant indicated: this inquiry reports a total knee replacement that subsequently became infected and was re-operated approximately 1 1/2 years after implantation.While no other information is provided in this particular inquiry, there are associated inquiries which document further surgeries including two-stage revision, arthrodesis, and subsequent amputation.I can confirm that these events occurred since i was able to review records documenting procedures.Regarding the root cause of infection following total knee arthroplasty 1 1/2 years after implantation, i cannot determine it with certainty.The causes are multifactorial including surgical actors and patient factors.Most commonly late infection occurs because of seeding of the arthroplasty from a remote site.As outlined above, this inquiry concerns a total knee replacement which became infected requiring subsequent surgeries which eventually led to an amputation of the right lower extremity.The causes of persistent infection following multiple surgeries after a total knee arthroplasty are multifactorial including surgical factors and patient factors and commonly due to seeding from a remote site.-product history review: could not be performed as lot code information was not provided.-complaint history review: could not be performed as lot code information was not provided.Conclusion: a review of medical records by clinical consultant indicated: this inquiry reports a total knee replacement that subsequently became infected and was re-operated approximately 1 1/2 years after implantation.While no other information is provided in this particular inquiry, there are associated inquiries which document further surgeries including two-stage revision, arthrodesis, and subsequent amputation.I can confirm that these events occurred since i was able to review records documenting procedures.Regarding the root cause of infection following total knee arthroplasty 1 1/2 years after implantation, i cannot determine it with certainty.The causes are multifactorial including surgical actors and patient factors.Most commonly late infection occurs because of seeding of the arthroplasty from a remote site.As outlined above, this inquiry concerns a total knee replacement which became infected requiring subsequent surgeries which eventually led to an amputation of the right lower extremity.The causes of persistent infection following multiple surgeries after a total knee arthroplasty are multifactorial including surgical factors and patient factors and commonly due to seeding from a remote site.Patient would like to know if his implants were involved in a recall.As device lot code was not provided, it is not possible to determine if the patient¿s implant is subject to a recall.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event or Problem Description
Patient reported a "clean out" of his right knee due to infection.It is unknown if any components were exchanged.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIATHLON PS X3 TIBIAL INSERT
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
diana rogers
210 centennial avenue
centennial park, elstree
borehamwood WD6 3-SJ
UK   WD6 3SJ
2082386500
MDR Report Key14545713
Report Number0002249697-2022-00783
Device Sequence Number6774085
Product Code MBH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327050783
UDI-Public07613327050783
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateVA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K141056
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/17/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number5532-G-511
Device Catalogue Number5532-G-511
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/06/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/04/2022
10/25/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/31/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/29/2022
11/17/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age71 DA
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight84 KG
-
-