• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G49940
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/16/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, upon opening a universa soft ureteral stent set, the stent was broken into 2 pieces.A new same type device was used to complete the ureterorenoscopy.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to the occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Event description: as reported, upon opening a universa soft ureteral stent set, the stent was broken into 2 pieces.A new same type device was used to complete the ureterorenoscopy.A section of the device did not remain inside the patients body.The patient did not require any additional procedures.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to the occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record (dhr), manufacturing instructions, the instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures.One universa soft ureteral stent set was returned for investigation in open packaging.The tether was still attached.The stent was torn at the untethered end.The tear appears rough, and is not associated with a sideport.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The information provided upon review of complaint file, device history record, complaint history and quality control documents did not provide evidence to support that the device was manufactured out of specification or to suggest items in the lot or similar devices in the field or in house were nonconforming.A review of relevant manufacturing and quality control documents was conducted.It was concluded that the stent shape was adequately inspected during quality control.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: how supplied upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that a cause for this event could not be determined.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET
Common Device Name
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key14556994
Report Number1820334-2022-00983
Device Sequence Number20123066
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002499409
UDI-Public(01)00827002499409(17)230324(10)13076123
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
K151051
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/24/2023
Device Model NumberG49940
Device Catalogue NumberUSH-622
Device Lot Number13076123
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/17/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/09/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/31/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/24/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-