• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DFR00V
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Visual Impairment (2138); Halo (2227)
Date of Event 02/07/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from a patient's left eye as the patient complained of seeing double and was bothered by halos.A vitrectomy was done and a non-johnson and johnson lens of 19.5 diopter was used as a replacement iol.Patient outcome is unknown.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d10: device available for evaluation ¿ yes, returned to manufacturer on 6/7/2022 section h3: device returned to manufacturer ¿ yes device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the lens was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and, no issues that could contribute to halo vision or poor visual acuity could be identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation can be performed.The reported complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the device were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search in complaint system revealed two complaints, although these complaint issues reported are related, the issue could not be confirmed as related to manufacturing; therefore, no escalations are required.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key14571701
Report Number3012236936-2022-01381
Device Sequence Number6169603
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474750654
UDI-Public(01)05050474750654(17)240317
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/17/2024
Device Model NumberDFR00V
Device Catalogue NumberDFR00VU190
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/19/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/28/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/02/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/17/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight93 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-