|
The actual complaint product was not returned for evaluation.A review of the device history record is not possible as no lot number was provided.Root cause could not be determined.All information reasonably known as of 03 jun 2022 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.Avanos medical inc.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the avanos medical complaint database and identified as complaint (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that an avanos medical inc.Product is defective or caused serious injury.Device not returned.
|
|
Fda medwatch / fda user facility report # (b)(4).Reported: the patient was 2 days post-op when the registered nurse (rn) was told by the day shift rn that the nasogastric tube (ng) had some resistance but was able to be flushed, it was just slow.At the beginning of their shift the rn was able to flush the ng tube with sterile water without any issues.The following morning the rn attempted to flush the ng with sterile water, to check it before administering the medication and noted that sterile water was coming out of the patient¿s nose.The rn stopped the flush and pulled back on the tube and removed approximately 61 cm of the tube, they noted that the end of the tube was broken/snapped.The rn alerted the physician (md) and a chest xray (cxray) and kub (chest xray and kidney, ureter, bladder x-ray) were ordered.The team was aware that the rn was unable to administer the medication to the patient.Based on the measurement, approximately 29 cm of the weighted ng tubing remained inside the patient, this was confirmed by the c-xray.A procedure to remove the remaining tubing was performed: the oropharynx was first carefully exposed using a tongue blade following this the distal end of the feeding tube became visible.A pediatric magill forcep was used to carefully grasp the feeding tube and it was used to remove the remaining distal end without any resistance.The distal end was checked with the proximal segment (removed at time of rupture) and it was confirmed to be the full length of the feeding tube in its entirety.An area of kinking was noted in the tube just distal to the site of the rupture; there was no report of patient injury.
|