• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Embolism/Embolus (4438)
Date of Event 11/01/2016
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
During its post-market surveillance activities on (b)(6) 2022, penumbra inc.Became aware of a journal article titled, "guide sheath advancement and aspiration in the distal petrocavernous internal carotid artery (guard) technique during thrombectomy improves reperfusion and clinical outcomes" (ansari et al.2019).In this retrospective case-control study, ninety patients who underwent thrombectomy procedures between november 2016 and august 2018 were divided into two groups based on thrombectomy technique.In all cases, a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max) or non-penumbra guide sheath was placed in the cervical internal carotid artery (ica) and a penumbra system ace 60 reperfusion catheter (ace60), penumbra system ace 64 reperfusion catheter (ace64), or penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68) was used together with a non-penumbra microcatheter and other devices, and aspiration was performed using the penumbra engine (engine).In one case that may have involved the neuron max, an ica dissection occurred following aggressive guide sheath advancement across the posterior genu segment of the cavernous ica, which was medically treated with aspirin and without neurologic sequelae.In another case that may have involved the neuron max, a suspected iatrogenic, non-flow-limiting intracranial mca dissection occurred and was managed medically with iv eptifibatide and post-procedural antiplatelets.The same issue occurred in two cases which involved the use of the ace60, ace64, or ace68.These cases were also managed medically with iv eptifibatide and post-procedural antiplatelets.It was reported that major iatrogenic complications occurred in two cases which involved the use of the ace60, ace64, or ace68.New territory emboli were visualized in the fetal posterior cerebral artery distribution and a secondary intraprocedural occlusion of the contralateral ica, respectively.Lastly, in five cases that may have involved the neuron max, minor access-site complications included a groin pseudoaneurysm requiring percutaneous thrombin injection, a carotid puncture-related pseudoaneurysm treated with sonography-guided compression, and three minor groin hematomas that were managed conservatively.It was not possible to ascertain specific device information from the article, nor to match the events reported with previously reported complaints.Therefore, this report addresses all malfunctions and/or adverse events within this literature source.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Potential adverse events in the labeling with the penumbra system include, but are not limited to, hematoma or hemorrhage at the site, acute occlusion, emboli, arteriovenous fistula, vessel spasm, vessel thrombosis, vessel dissection or vessel perforation, inability to completely remove thrombus, intracranial hemorrhage, ischemia, including death.Therefore, it was determined that the reported adverse event was an anticipated complication.The product was not returned for evaluation.From the information provided, there is no indication that there was any device malfunction, nonconformance, or misuse that contributed to the reported event.The product lot number was not provided; therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2022-00256, 3005168196-2022-00257, 3005168196-2022-00259, 3005168196-2022-00260, 3005168196-2022-00261.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM REPERFUSION CATHETER
Common Device Name
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key14599020
Report Number3005168196-2022-00258
Device Sequence Number5624780
Product Code NRY
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K160449
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Literature,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/03/2022
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/10/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/03/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-