Model Number ZCU150 |
Device Problem
Unstable (1667)
|
Patient Problems
Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Impairment (2138); Prolapse (2475)
|
Event Date 12/23/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Weight: unknown/no information.Ethnicity: unknown/no information.The device has not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information.However, to date the information has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was initially reported an explant of an intraocular lens (iol) was planned due to patient complaints of blurry vision for both distance and reading.The iol was subsequently explanted from the patient¿s right eye.The right eye axial length was off center.Questionable push on lens implant due to elevated intraocular pressure was indicated.Also, astigmatism was showing +2.00 for the right eye (od) and ora (optiwave refractive analysis) was used.The patient was observed during post-op examination.The blurry vision was reportedly not correctable better than 20/60 with glasses.The patient healed with more astigmatism than planned.Pre-op visual acuity 20/50, post-op visual acuity 20/60.Additional information was provided stating initially the explant procedure was delayed as the patient was out of town.However, the iol was subsequently explanted, but no replacement lens was implanted after the explant was performed.The patient was left aphakic and was referred to a retinal specialist due to needing a 3-piece iol sutured in, due to iris prolapse and posterior pressure during explant.The health care provider reported no patient injury and no medical or surgical interventions were required such as incision enlargement, vitrectomy, or sutures.Further it was confirmed that there was a lens rotation to the right eye.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: additional information received from the account clarified that the correct date of explant is (b)(6) 2022 and not (b)(6) 2022, which they had initially stated.This supplemental mdr report is to correct the information which was entered in the section "d6b" of the initial mdr report.The following field was updated accordingly: section d6b: if explanted, give date: (b)(6) 2022.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: section a2: age: 71 years.Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer: yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: jun 22, 2022.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside of a specimen cup.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut into three pieces and with both haptics detached (one missing).The lens was cleaned and, no issues that could contribute to visual issues and rotation could be identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|