|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. 8.0MM FIXED {} ENDCUTTING RMR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
71118224 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/24/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during an internal fixation surgery, procedure was performed according to the technique described, placing the definitive implant 8/7mmx28cm, once the last reamer was reached, there was difficulty due to the space of the intramedullary canal.At one point of the drilling the resistance was lost and, under the image intensifier, it was evidenced that the 8.0mm fixed endcutting reamer broke.An attempt was made to remove the piece using the olive guide and pliers, but the olive guide also broke.Different maneuvers were performed to extract the broken pieces, and finally, the rest of the guide and the reamer were removed.But under the observation of image intensifiers it was evident that there was still a piece of the reamer in the channel and the anatomical location it was too complex to remove.The patient´s health condition is stable, and no further complications were reported.This situation caused a 2 hour delay in the surgery.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for evaluation but the pictures were reviewed, and confirmed the device is broken.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, although the root cause of the reported event could not be definitively concluded, user technique could not be ruled out as a potential contributing factor.S&n recommends surgical instruments be assessed prior to use and replaced as necessary.The patient impact beyond the retained foreign body (fb) and the reported extensive 2-hour surgical delay during the unexpected interventions/multiple attempts to remove the fb cannot be determined.However, although unlikely, possible micro-motion and/or migration, and local irritation/discomfort cannot be explicitly ruled out.Reportedly, the patient is stable with no further complications reported.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of complaint history of the previous 12 months revealed similar events for the listed device, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to surgical technique used or user/procedural variance.The contribution of the device to the reported incident could be corroborated as it caused 2 hour delay in the surgery.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d4 and h4 were updated due to new information received.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device confirmed the stated failure mode.The device was found to be fractured along the shaft, rendering the device inoperative.The device shows signs of extensive use.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that although the root cause of the reported event could not be definitively concluded, user technique could not be ruled out as a potential contributing factor.S&n recommends surgical instruments be assessed prior to use and replaced as necessary.The patient impact beyond the retained foreign body (fb) and the reported extensive 2-hour surgical delay during the unexpected interventions/multiple attempts to remove the fb cannot be determined.However, although unlikely, possible micro-motion and/or migration, and local irritation/discomfort cannot be explicitly ruled out.Reportedly, the patient is stable with no further complications reported.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.A contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated as the device shows signs of damage/wear.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are probable causes of the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|