• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number 466P306X
Medical Device Problem Code Unintended Movement (3026)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Perforation (2001); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Stenosis (2263)
Date of Event 04/09/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused perforation, tilt, and stenosis.The indication for the filter implant has not been provided and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The trapease ivc filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Stenosis is an abnormal narrowing of a vessel and does not represent a device malfunction.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient, pharmacological and vessel characteristics.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with practitioner technique and/or vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Vessel perforation is a known adverse event associated with implanting vena cava filters and is listed as such in the instructions for use (ifu).The ifu notes vessel damage such as intimal tears and perforation as procedural and long-term complications related to ivc filters.The timing and mechanism of the events has not been reported at this time and a clinical conclusion could not be determined as to the cause of the event.Without procedural films or post implant imaging available for review, the reported events could not be confirmed or further clarified.There is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and/or manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported by the legal department, the patient underwent placement of the trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to the patient including, but not limited to, filter perforation, tilt, and stenosis.As a direct and proximate result, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received per the medical records indicate that the patient had a preoperative diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (dvt) and contraindication for anticoagulation.The patient had significant hemorrhage while on anticoagulant for very large rectal hemorrhoids.The patient needed treatment for these hemorrhoids.The patient also had bilateral lower extremity acute dvt.The filter was implanted via the patient's right femoral veins.A venogram was obtained revealing a widely patent ivc.The filter was deployed.A postprocedural venogram revealed a widely patent filter and continued patency of the renal veins.Additional information received per the patient profile form (ppf) states that the patient experienced tilt and perforation of filter struts outside the inferior vena cava (ivc).The patient became aware of the reported events approximately twelve years and five months after the index procedure.The patient also experienced anxiety, shortness of breath, blurry vision, dizziness, "balance is off" and unspecified issues with both legs.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused perforation, tilt, and stenosis.The patient reported becoming aware of tilt and perforation of filter struts outside the inferior vena cava (ivc), approximately twelve years and five months post implant.The patient also reported anxiety, shortness of breath, blurry vision, dizziness, "balance is off" and unspecified issues with both legs due to the filter.According to the medical record the indication for the filter implant was deep vein thrombosis (dvt) and contraindication for anticoagulation.The patient had significant hemorrhage on anticoagulant for very large rectal hemorrhoids.The patient needed treatment for these hemorrhoids but had bilateral lower extremity acute dvt.The filter was implanted via the right femoral vein.A venogram was obtained revealing a widely patent ivc.The filter was deployed.A postprocedural venogram revealed a widely patent filter and continued patency of the renal veins.The product remains implanted and unavailable for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The trapease ivc filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Stenosis is an abnormal narrowing of a vessel and does not represent a device malfunction.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient, pharmacological and vessel characteristics.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with practitioner technique and/or vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Vessel perforation is a known adverse event associated with implanting vena cava filters and is listed as such in the instructions for use (ifu).The ifu notes vessel damage such as intimal tears and perforation as procedural and long-term complications related to ivc filters.The timing and mechanism of the events has not been reported at this time and a clinical conclusion could not be determined as to the cause of the event.Without procedural films or post implant imaging available for review, the reported events could not be confirmed or further clarified.Anxiety, shortness of breath, blurry vision, dizziness, and unspecified issues with both legs do not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient specific issues or other undisclosed comorbidities.There is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and/or manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI
Common Device Name
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes, FL 33014
7863138372
MDR Report Key14647140
Report Number9616099-2022-05701
Device Sequence Number12201634
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier20705032009451
UDI-Public20705032009451
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K020316
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2008
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2011
Device Model Number466P306X
Device Catalogue Number466P306AU
Device Lot NumberR0508393
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/16/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/14/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/09/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/20/2008
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
6 FRENCH PINNACLE DESTINATION SHEATH.; BENSON WIRE.; UNKNOWN 18 GAUGE SINGLE-WALL ENTRY NEEDLE.; UNKNOWN 20 ML SYRINGE.; UNKNOWN CATHETER.; UNKNOWN OBTURATOR.; UNKNOWN.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Life Threatening;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-