• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL GALAXY G3 MINI 1MM X 1CM; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL GALAXY G3 MINI 1MM X 1CM; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number GLM910010
Medical Device Problem Code Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/02/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported by the field, prior to use, a 1mm x 1cm galaxy g3 mini coil (glm910010, 30392236) detached before the procedure.There was no patient injury as the device was not clinically used.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Procode:krd/hcg.The device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.Based on the visual analysis of the one photo accompanied with the compliant file.The device can be observed coiled inside of a pouch, a kink can be observed in the dpu at the marker bands section, and another kink was observed on the green section of the introducer near the tip introducer.Also, it can be observed that the embolic coil is no longer attached to the rest of the device, although the embolic coil could not be observed in the picture, and it is not possible to determine if the rh is heated, the detached condition noted on the embolic coil is related to the customer complaint.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The customer complaint was confirmed.This investigation was performed based only on the photo provided.If the product is received after this investigation, an assessment will be performed as per the conditions of the device returned.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Updated sections on this medwatch: b4, , g3, g6, h2, h6, h6 and h10.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Complaint conclusion: as reported by the field, prior to use, a 1mm x 1cm galaxy g3 mini coil (glm910010, 30392236) detached before the procedure.There was no patient injury as the device was not clinically used.No additional information is available.One photo accompanied the compliant file.In it, the device can be observed coiled inside of a pouch, a kink can be observed in the dpu at the marker bands section, and another kink was observed on the green section of the introducer near the tip introducer.Also, it can be observed that the embolic coil is no longer attached to the rest of the device, although due to the resolution and the distance of the photo it is not possible to determine if the coil has some damage on it or if the rh is heated, the detached condition noted on the embolic coil is related to the customer complaint.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The device was returned to cerenovus for further investigation.A non-sterile galaxy g3 mini 1mm x 1cm was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Upon receiving the device, a visual inspection was performed, and the core wire was found kinked at 3 inches (7.62 cm) and 14.25 inches (36.195 cm) from the proximal end, this damage is consistent with the damage noted in the picture provided by the customer.No other damages were found in the device.Further inspection under microscopic magnification revealed that the embolic coil was severely stretched, and it remains attached to the rest of the device, as opposed to the event description, and as observed on the photo.The distal outer sheath had not been softened indicating that the resistance heating coil had not been heated and the detachment process was not initiated.Although the coil detachment had been previously confirmed based on the photo received, the returned device confirmed that the embolic coil was still attached and had to be confirmed through observation under magnification.The customer complaint was not confirmed.Coil stretching is a known potential problem associated with the use of this device.The instructions for use (ifu) provide proper handling instructions for the device to prevent this problem from occurring.Stretching can occur during handling where force may have been inadvertently applied plus other procedural factors not described in this complaint can result in stretching of the coil.The stretched condition of the embolic coil was not originally reported in the complaint.With the limited information available, the root cause of the coil stretching remains unknown.It is possible that continuous flush had not been done, without an adequate flush, issue such as resistance between the coil and the microcatheter can arise, which may cause some force to be inadvertently exerted on the device, which can result in the coil becoming stretched or kinked or both.However, this cannot be conclusively determined.There is no indication that the issue reported in the complaint is a result of a defect inherently related to the device.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.It should be noted that product failure could be caused by multiple factors.The instructions for use (ifu) do contain the following recommendations: ¿ do not fasten the rhv valve too tightly around the introducer sheath since excessive pressure may cause damage to the introducer sheath and/or the microcoil as it is advanced into the infusion microcatheter.Multiple attempts to obtain additional information were unsuccessful.If information is provided at a later date, the file will be reopened and processed accordingly.As part of the cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint#: (b)(4).Section b5: additional information received indicated that the product was stored in a box as in the conventional storage method.The device was stored and handled according to the instructions for use (ifu).There was no damage noted to the packaging.The integrity of the sterile pouch was not compromised.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GALAXY G3 MINI 1MM X 1CM
Common Device Name
NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. (FREMONT)
47709 fremont blvd
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer Contact
michelleann garcia
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
646591-7981
MDR Report Key14654772
Report Number3008114965-2022-00412
Device Sequence Number5109411
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier10886704080213
UDI-Public10886704080213
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
K171862
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/17/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2023
Device Model NumberGLM910010
Device Catalogue NumberGLM910010
Device Lot Number30392236
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/02/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/12/2022
08/01/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/10/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/28/2022
08/17/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/05/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-