• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDIVANCE, INC. ¿ 1725056 ARCTIC SUN® 5000; ARCTIC SUN DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDIVANCE, INC. ¿ 1725056 ARCTIC SUN® 5000; ARCTIC SUN DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number 50000000
Device Problems Insufficient Cooling (1130); Pumping Problem (3016)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/24/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.The information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the nurse noted the patient temperature was 39.8c on the arctic sun device, but the target temperature was 37c, water temperature was 21.6c, flow rate was 1.8lpm and large pads were used.The nurse denied any alerts or alarms, however when mss guided nurse to the event log alert 113 (reduced water temperature control) was in the recent history.The nurse stated that they have already changed machines and decreased the target temperature to 33c.The second device would not give them a flow rate.Mss guided to system diagnostics and noted that t4 (chiller temperature) was cold (4c) while the mixing pump command was 100percentage, system hours were 8361 and pump hours were 6826.Mss explained this one needed to go to biomed, but they could troubleshoot the device with no flow to see if they could get it running.They could also test the pads to see if one or more of them was leaking air.The nurse was elected not to do this and to use a cooling blanket on the patient instead and nurse would send both the device to biomed.Per follow up information received via phone on 02jun2022, tech support reviewed data files and showed a failed mixing pump.Biomed stated they would repair onsite and no patient injury was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported issue was confirmed.The root cause of the reported issue was isolated to a faulty mixing pump.The nurse noted the patient temperature was 39.8c on the arctic sun device, but the target temperature was 37c.Water temperature was 21.6c, flow rate was 1.8lpm and large pads were used.The nurse denied any alerts or alarms, however when mss guided nurse to the event log alert 113 (reduced water temperature control) was in the recent history.The nurse stated that they have already changed machines and decreased the target temperature to 33c.Mss guided to system diagnostics and noted that t4 (chiller temperature) was cold (4c) while the mixing pump command was 100percentage, system hours were 8361 and pump hours were 6826.Mss explained this one needed to go to biomed, but they could troubleshoot the device with no flow to see if they could get it running.They could also test the pads to see if one or more of them was leaking air.The nurse was elected not to do this and to use a cooling blanket on the patient instead and nurse would send both the device to biomed.Per follow up information received, tech support reviewed data files and showed a failed mixing pump.Biomed stated they would repair onsite.No patient injury was reported.It is known that the device did not meet specifications and the device was influenced by the reported failure.The device was in use on a patient.The dhr is not required as the device has undergone previous servicing and therefore the reported issue is not manufacturing related.The labelling review is not required since the reported issue was confirmed through other elements of the investigation to not be labeling or packaging related.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the nurse noted the patient temperature was 39.8c on the arctic sun device, but the target temperature was 37c, water temperature was 21.6c, flow rate was 1.8lpm and large pads were used.The nurse denied any alerts or alarms, however when mss guided nurse to the event log alert 113 (reduced water temperature control) was in the recent history.The nurse stated that they have already changed machines and decreased the target temperature to 33c.The second device would not give them a flow rate.Mss guided to system diagnostics and noted that t4 (chiller temperature) was cold (4c) while the mixing pump command was 100percentage, system hours were 8361 and pump hours were 6826.Mss explained this one needed to go to biomed, but they could troubleshoot the device with no flow to see if they could get it running.They could also test the pads to see if one or more of them was leaking air.The nurse was elected not to do this and to use a cooling blanket on the patient instead and nurse would send both the device to biomed.Per follow up information received via phone on 02jun2022, tech support reviewed data files and showed a failed mixing pump.Biomed stated they would repair onsite and no patient injury was reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARCTIC SUN® 5000
Type of Device
ARCTIC SUN DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDIVANCE, INC. ¿ 1725056
321 s taylor ave
suite 200
louisville 80027
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDIVANCE, INC. ¿ 1725056
321 s taylor ave
suite 200
louisville 80027
Manufacturer Contact
juan velez
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key14682470
MDR Text Key293930815
Report Number1018233-2022-04581
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWJ
UDI-Device Identifier00801741080142
UDI-Public(01)00801741080142
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K161602
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number50000000
Device Catalogue Number50000000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/24/2022
Initial Date FDA Received06/13/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/03/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-