|
The article, ¿treatment experience of percutaneous embolization using multiple-closure embolization for porous atrial septal defect (masd)¿, was reviewed.The research article presents a background of percutaneous embolization for porous atrial septal defect (masd), the number of obturator plugs, closing plugs selection, and the placement procedures treatment required for each individual.The purpose is to report masd treatment experience using multiple-closure plugs in our hospital and to investigate the factors that influenced closure plug selection.Cases were reviewed retrospectively to investigate the number of defect holes, size, distance between holes, indwelling closure plug, relationship with surrounding structures, and presence of residual shunt.[case 2].A 7-year-old girl.A mesh-shaped defect hole containing an accessory hole with an interforaminal distance of 6mm, 3mm posterior to the main foramen of 7mm.First, an amplatzer multifenestrated septal occluder caso-mf) 18mm was placed in the accessory foramen, resulting in a small amount of residual shunt, and a aso 6mm was placed in the main foramen.Residual shunt trivial without interfering with surrounding tissue.The article concluded [ it was considered important to evaluate the relationship between defect pore morphology, size, and surrounding structures when appropriate during treatment.] the primary author reiko kawai, md, and corresponding author of this article is tetsuko ishii, yuta mizuno, tomoe yamagata, kentaro okushi, ichiju sato, and hiromichi nakajima, and (b)(6).
|
|
As reported in a research article, a patient underwent closure of a porous atrial septal defect with an 18mm amplatzer cribriform occluder and a 6mm amptalzer septal occluder (aso).The cribriform was implanted in the accessory foramen and the aso was implanted in the main foramen.An event of residual shunt was reported.A more comprehensive assessment could not be performed as the event was non-contemporaneously reported through a literature review, and no device or additional patient information was received for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.
|