• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ALTRUA 60; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ALTRUA 60; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number S602
Medical Device Problem Code Premature Discharge of Battery (1057)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/22/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This product has not been returned to boston scientific, and as a result, laboratory analysis could not be conducted.The associated investigation determined that battery status indicators were different than expected based on information provided to boston scientific.Factors influencing the estimated longevity remaining calculation include pacing rate, amplitude, pulse-width and lead impedance.Any (even slight) changes in these factors will impact the battery consumption calculation and therefore the remaining longevity estimate.Please refer to the section for more information regarding the specific circumstances of this event.Please note this pacemakers battery was designed to estimate remaining longevity (and trigger corresponding device replacement indicators) based on the pacing capacitor charge time, which progressively increases as the battery depletes.These pacemakers were not designed with an ability to calculate remaining longevity for every possible current drain, which may cause replacement indicators to trigger earlier than what was previously estimated; however, it does not negatively impact the use, operation, safety, or performance of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that there were concerns regarding alleged premature battery depletion of this pacemaker.At the most recent follow-up, six months prior, the longevity remaining was about 2.5 years.At the latest clinic appointment, the device had met end of life since 30apr2022.Data was provided for analysis and boston scientific technical services indicated that the device is functioning normally.This device has been implanted over 11 years which is over the estimated battery life.The plan is to replace this device.No adverse patient effects were reported.At this time, this device remains implanted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This product has not been returned to boston scientific, and as a result, laboratory analysis could not be conducted.The associated investigation determined that battery status indicators were different than expected based on information provided to boston scientific.Factors influencing the estimated longevity remaining calculation include pacing rate, amplitude, pulse-width and lead impedance.Any (even slight) changes in these factors will impact the battery consumption calculation and therefore the remaining longevity estimate.Please refer to the section b5 for more information regarding the specific circumstances of this event.Please note this pacemakers battery was designed to estimate remaining longevity (and trigger corresponding device replacement indicators) based on the pacing capacitor charge time, which progressively increases as the battery depletes.These pacemakers were not designed with an ability to calculate remaining longevity for every possible current drain, which may cause replacement indicators to trigger earlier than what was previously estimated; however, it does not negatively impact the use, operation, safety, or performance of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that there were concerns regarding alleged premature battery depletion of this pacemaker.At the most recent follow-up, six months prior, the longevity remaining was about 2.5 years.At the latest clinic appointment, the device had met end of life since 30apr2022.Data was provided for analysis and boston scientific technical services indicated that the device is functioning normally.This device has been implanted over 11 years which is over the estimated battery life.The plan is to replace this device.Subsequently, this device was explanted and replaced with a competitor device.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that there were concerns regarding alleged premature battery depletion of this pacemaker.At the most recent follow-up, six months prior, the longevity remaining was about 2.5 years.At the latest clinic appointment, the device had met end of life since 30apr2022.Data was provided for analysis and boston scientific technical services indicated that the device is functioning normally.This device has been implanted over 11 years which is over the estimated battery life.The plan is to replace this device.Subsequently, this device was explanted and replaced with a competitor device.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, detailed mechanical and electrical testing was performed on the device.The device battery status was eol.The device functioned normally throughout testing.Laboratory analysis determined that this device experienced normal battery depletion; however, the estimated longevity remaining value appeared to decrease more quickly than expected between routine follow-ups.Factors influencing the estimated longevity remaining calculation include pacing rate, amplitude, pulse-width and lead impedance.Any (even slight) changes in these factors will impact the battery consumption calculation and therefore the remaining longevity estimate.Please note that, despite the drop in estimated longevity remaining, the actual battery condition did not change significantly between follow-ups.In summary, it was determined that this device experienced normal battery depletion, but declared eol earlier than previously estimated.Of note, the estimated remaining battery longevity of this pacemaker was designed to be calculated (and trigger corresponding device replacement indicators) based on the pacing capacitor charge time, which progressively increases as the battery depletes.These pacemakers were not designed with an ability to calculate remaining longevity for every possible current drain, which may cause replacement indicators to trigger earlier than what was previously estimated; however, it does not negatively impact the use, operation, safety, or performance of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALTRUA 60
Common Device Name
IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key14732277
Report Number2124215-2022-21863
Device Sequence Number17592481
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526484476
UDI-Public00802526484476
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryNZ
PMA/510(K) Number
N970003/S096
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2010
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/01/2012
Device Model NumberS602
Device Catalogue NumberS602
Device Lot Number767053
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/10/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/20/2022
04/06/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/17/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/22/2022
04/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/05/2010
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-