• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: S.B.M. SAS PULLUP; PULLUP ADJUSTABLE JUXTACORTICAL FIXATION SYSTEM FOR LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

S.B.M. SAS PULLUP; PULLUP ADJUSTABLE JUXTACORTICAL FIXATION SYSTEM FOR LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PULLU01201
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/27/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
(b)(4).Incident occured in (b)(6): description of the incident: "two white wires used for tightening, go into the same hole"."when the surgeon knew the problem, it already squeezed 1 end, can't take it out anymore".Clinical consequence: "not yet".Additional surgery: "not yet".Patient retains a piece of the first medical device used.Surgical time was increased over than 30 mn related to this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Date: (b)(6) 2022.No incident during manufacturing - no other complaint concerning this batch number.Additional information: the first pullup had a defect (description of the incident) and a second was used to complete the surgery: is it correct? i confirmed that just 1 pullup had a defect.Was the surgical technique strictly followed? yes.Did this delay over than 30mn involve the revision of the anesthesia protocol? no.Is the surgeon familiar with the medical device? yes.According with current legislation of your country, is this type of event should be reported to your national competent authority? no.A photo is available for assessment and we are waiting for further information: analysis is ongoing.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Date: june 20, 2022.No incident during manufacturing - no other complaint concerning this batch number.Additional information: the first pullup had a defect (description of the incident) and a second was used to complete the surgery: is it correct? i confirmed that just 1 pullup had a defect.Was the surgical technique strictly followed? yes did this delay over than 30mn involve the revision of the anesthesia protocol? no is the surgeon familiar with the medical device? yes according with current legislation of your country, is this type of event should be reported to your national competent authority? no a photo is available for assessment and we are waiting for further information: analysis is ongoing.____________________________________________________ date: october 18, 2022 - follow up1 - additional information.The patient kept a piece of the first device used - surgical time was increased over than 30mn related to this event.The manufacturing data does not reveal any production anomalies.The manufactured devices comply with the manufacturing data.No anomalies and/or scrap during the assembly phase.The presence of the two free strands of the white braid in the same hole is due to the fact that the braid moved in the plate and more particularly that the strand migrated from the exit end of the 2nd splice into the passage hole of the braid strand of the 1st splice.Verification: passage of the strand of the 2nd splice into the passage hole of the 1st one requires a tensile force on the braid while maintaining the plate.When this phenomenon occurs, a hard point can be felt.Passing the device through the tunnel according to our recommendations for use cannot cause this phenomenon.Tensioning the device by alternately pulling the two strands of the white braid according to our recommendations for use cannot cause this phenomenon.The only test configuration where this phenomenon could be reproduced is when removing the device from the assembly card.The phenomenon has been reproduced with the button-plate positioned inside the flap of the assembly card where the notch is and when pulling the braid from one side of the loop.Hypothesis n°1: when removing pullup from the assembly card, the strand under the button-plate must have been dragged.Hypothesis n° 2: the medical device was damaged before assembly, it should not have been assembled, and should have been replaced by another one.Event very isolated - expertise report transmitted to our distributor for explanation - technical support provided by our sales department.No corrective action implemented.
 
Event Description
Fnconf-22-0090.Incident occured in vietnam: description of the incident: "two white wires used for tightening, go into the same hole" - "when the surgeon knew the problem, it already squeezed 1 end, can't take it out anymore".Clinical consequence: "not yet".Additional surgery: "not yet".Patient retains a piece of the first medical device used - surgical time was increased over than 30 mn related to this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULLUP
Type of Device
PULLUP ADJUSTABLE JUXTACORTICAL FIXATION SYSTEM FOR LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
Manufacturer (Section D)
S.B.M. SAS
zi du monge
lourdes, 65100
FR  65100
Manufacturer (Section G)
S.B.M. SAS
zi du monge
lourdes, 65100
FR   65100
Manufacturer Contact
regine bareilles
zi du monge
lourdes, 65100
FR   65100
MDR Report Key14743172
MDR Text Key295028843
Report Number3004549189-2022-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeVM
PMA/PMN Number
K151004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/20/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberPULLU01201
Device Lot Number215501
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/02/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-