• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ACCLARENT, INC. TRUDI PROBE, 70, 5IN; EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ACCLARENT, INC. TRUDI PROBE, 70, 5IN; EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number TDP0705
Medical Device Problem Code Incorrect Interpretation of Signal (1543)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/23/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Conclusion: the healthcare professional reported that during a primary functional endoscopic sinus surgery (fess) and septoplasty procedure, the location accuracy of the trudi probe 70, 5in (tdp0705 / 210226b-pc) was off.The location of the probe that was displayed on the trudi system appeared to be 4 or more mm off.The further posterior and superior that they moved the probe, the less accurate the location of the probe seemed to be.The probe was registered two times without resolution.The procedure was continued without the use of the probe.On 01-jun-2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that when the accuracy issue was noted, the trudi probe was being held in the trudi zone.The icon on the trudi system was green.There was no error message on the trudi nav monitor for the device.The device was plugged in after registration (i.E., using the registration probe).The patient tracker was not moved and the patient tracker cable was not under tension in relation to the event.Troubleshooting was performed in that the device was plugged into a different port as well and it was registered twice.The inaccuracy was determined ¿first by the suctions which were probably over 4mm off.Then we proceeded with the probe that was also off by over roughly 2mm.We checked by using anatomical structures including skull base.It showed that it was inferior to skull base even when we could see it was hovering right on it in the scope view.¿ there was no ferromagnetic material placed within the trudi zone.The crosshair did not turn yellow.The emitter pad and the patient did not move.There was no other device¿s shaft in the proximity to the emitter pad¿s transmitter.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (210226b-pc) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.The device will not be returned for analysis and therefore, no further investigation can be performed at this time.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As a result, the investigation will be closed.With the information available and without the complaint product available to be returned for analysis, the reported issue in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and without the return of the complaint sample; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by acclarent, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, acclarent, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Event or Problem Description
The healthcare professional reported that during a primary functional endoscopic sinus surgery (fess) and septoplasty procedure, the location accuracy of the trudi probe 70, 5in (tdp0705 / 210226b-pc) was off.The location of the probe that was displayed on the trudi system appeared to be 4 or more mm off.The further posterior and superior that they moved the probe, the less accurate the location of the probe seemed to be.The probe was registered two times without resolution.The procedure was continued without the use of the probe.On 01-jun-2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that when the accuracy issue was noted, the trudi probe was being held in the trudi zone.The icon on the trudi system was green.There was no error message on the trudi nav monitor for the device.The device was plugged in after registration (i.E., using the registration probe).The patient tracker was not moved and the patient tracker cable was not under tension in relation to the event.Troubleshooting was performed in that the device was plugged into a different port as well and it was registered twice.The inaccuracy was determined ¿first by the suctions which were probably over 4mm off.Then we proceeded with the probe that was also off by over roughly 2mm.We checked by using anatomical structures including skull base.It showed that it was inferior to skull base even when we could see it was hovering right on it in the scope view.¿ there was no ferromagnetic material placed within the trudi zone.The crosshair did not turn yellow.The emitter pad and the patient did not move.There was no other device¿s shaft in the proximity to the emitter pad¿s transmitter.Based on the additional information received, when the accuracy issue was observed, the trudi probe was being held in the trudi zone and the icon on the trudi system was green.This event has been deemed reportable as a ¿malfunction.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRUDI PROBE, 70, 5IN
Common Device Name
EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ACCLARENT, INC.
31 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ACCLARENT, INC.
31 technology drive
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
michelleann garcia
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
646591-7981
MDR Report Key14749157
Report Number3005172759-2022-00009
Device Sequence Number4706040
Product Code PGW
UDI-Device Identifier10705031464209
UDI-Public10705031464209
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateUT
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K193453
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/20/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/26/2023
Device Model NumberTDP0705
Device Catalogue NumberTDP0705
Device Lot Number210226B-PC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/01/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/26/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-