|
|
| Model Number |
K833H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/24/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2022 and suture was used.During the procedure, the needle broke.Needle was recovered.No adverse patient consequences were reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Sample analysis: one open box with thirty-two unopened samples of product code k833h, lot rmbbqd were returned to ethicon for analysis.Visual inspection and functional test evaluation were conducted on the returned device.As per the sampling plan, a visual inspection was performed on thirteen samples, the packets were opened, and no defects were detected.The swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The needles were intact and no damage, or breakage on the body, tip, or swage area were observed during evaluation.Functional test was performed, to needle by resistance and met the requirements.The event described could not be confirmed as the device performed without any defect noted.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this lot-serial number were reviewed, and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this batch.It should be noted that as part of our quality process, each batch is randomly inspected and functionally tested during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment.There may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that we were unable to duplicate during our laboratory analysis.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained via: yes, the needle fell into the patient and the piece was recovered.(this piece has been sent in with the suture we are returning) to my knowledge no xrays were taken as the surgeon immediately grabbed the piece that broke.To my knowledge measures taken were a grasper grabbing the piece.To my knowledge no additional tissue damage occurred.My understanding is no pieces of the needle remain in the patient.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # = > (b)(4) date sent to the fda: 07/22/2022 h6 component code: g07002 - no device problem found this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: d9, h3, h6 investigation summary: a failed suture needle, labeled as (b)(4), was submitted fractographic evaluation on june 20, 2022.The component was identified as product code k833h.It was requested that assess the fracture mode of the failure.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of (b)(4)revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.This was a ductile fracture.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred at the attachment area of the needle during use due to tensile overload.There is no evidence of any material flaw or defect that would cause premature failure.In order to avoid this kind of damage grasp the needle in an area one-third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the distance from the attachment end to the point.The needle breakage was confirmed.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|