No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #3).Additional emdrs were submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralex st patch (device #2) and bard/davol kugel hernia patch (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch, ventralex st patch and ventralight st on (b)(6) 2016 and/or (b)(6) 2016 and/or (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against all devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|