|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix e/x mesh on (b)(6) 2008.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against composix e/x mesh.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient sustained personal injury, experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix e/x mesh on (b)(6) 2008.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against composix e/x mesh.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient sustained personal injury, experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2008- patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of composix e/x mesh (device 1).(note: no op notes were provided in mr) (b)(6) 2021- patient had abdominal wall abscess with infected hernia mesh, small bowel fistula to mesh thereby underwent repair with removal of mesh (device 1) and implant of phasix st mesh (device 2), small bowel resection and lysis of adhesions.Per op notes, "encountered a small abscess.Fistulization to the mesh, found to be a mesh infection.The mesh (device 1) was removed and a phasix st mesh (device 2) was placed.".
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-aug-2007) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b3, b4, b5, b7, d1, d3, d4, d6b, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|