|
|
| Catalog Number |
0134790 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
07/27/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix l/p (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralex mesh (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralex and composix lp on (b)(6) 2011 and/or (b)(6) 2013.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient sustained injuries on (b)(6) 2013 and (b)(6) 2020 due to the hernia mesh device.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2012) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4, d6a, d6b, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix l/p (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralex mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralex and composix lp on (b)(6) 2011 and/or (b)(6) 2013.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient sustained injuries on (b)(6) 2013 and (b)(6) 2020 due to the hernia mesh device.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2011 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of ventralex patch (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿a ventralex patch (device #1) was placed into fascial defects using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2013 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated ventral incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿adhesion between small bowel and mesh were lysed.The mesh (device #1) was completely excised.A composix l/p mesh (device #2) was placed and sewn to defect.¿ (b)(6) 2020 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿at cranial edge of hernia defect, there were densely adhered small bowel to previously placed mesh (device #2).A well incorporated mesh (device #2) was removed, and synthetic mesh was placed to reconstruct the sac using sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|