| Model Number |
DFR00V |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Eye Injury (1845)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pt info: information unknown/ asked but not available.Date of event: the exact date is unknown, the best estimate is between may 4, 2022 and jun 2, 2022.The device has not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, the information has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from a patient's right eye in a secondary surgical procedure.The reason for the explant was not specified.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected data::in review, it was noted that fields of "d2" of the initial mdr report were inadvertently populated with incorrect information.Also, in the initial mdr report the date of surgery/explant of "(b)(6) 2022" was entered in section "d6b"; however, additional information on the cup indicated that date of surgery was "(b)(6) 2022".Therefore, these corrections have been included in this supplemental mdr report and the following fields were updated accordingly: section d2: common device name: lens, multifocal intraocular.Section d2: device product code: mfk.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: "(b)(6) 2022.Additional information section d9: device available for evaluation? yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on: jul 29, 2022 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside of a specimen cup.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half and with a haptic detached.The lens was cleaned and, no issues could be identified that could contribute to injury.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be identified.The complaint issues of "explant and unspecified injury" were not confirmed.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
In review, it was noted that "g4 -combination product" field was inadvertently left blank and not populated in the initial mdr report.The information has been corrected in this supplemental mdr report and the following field was updated accordingly: combination product: no.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected data: in review, it was noticed that the customer contact person's email address was inadvertently not entered in the section "e1" of the follow-up number #1 mdr report; therefore, the information has been captured in this supplemental mdr report and the following field has been updated accordingly: section e1: email address: (b)(6).All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|